AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Anne Baldzikowski

CAHM159 · CAHM168 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can work independently, rely on classmates, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor supportHeavy readingFew graded itemsMixed lab experienceBeginner-unfriendly
  • Most recent reviews describe poor help, weak preparation, and students relying on classmates instead of the instructor.
  • Students report , and .
  • One older review is very positive, but it is outweighed by three strongly negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students earned A grades, but reviews suggest success depends .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students describe the beginner course as unexpectedly advanced, reading-heavy, and hard to navigate.

, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as strictly mandatory, but one positive review says passing requires showing up and doing the work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students warn against the course because they felt unsupported, dismissed, or left to figure things out alone.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and few graded items, though some students still earned A grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Reviews mention compact reading, lots of , and difficult submission requirements.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students describe poor preparation, low support, and discouraging responses when they ask for help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and few graded items, so assessment appears mixed but concentrated.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, preparation, workload, and beginner expectations.

Main concern

Students may not .

What students said

“Tells you to ask anyone else besides her.”
CAHM159
“She gave 50 pages of very compact text to read the first week.”
CAHM159
“Please spare yourself some misery and stay far, far away.”
CAHM168

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention the class is test heavy, but they do not clearly .

Test Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam policy or .

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
CAHM159

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please spare yourself some misery and stay far, far away.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Tells you to ask anyone else besides her.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“She gave 50 pages of very compact text to read the first week.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“Please spare yourself some misery and stay far, far away.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • Tells you to ask anyone else besides her.
  • If you reach out for .
  • Shes always happy to help whenever you need it.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • She gave 50 pages of very compact text to read the first week.
  • Lots of homework
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

⚖️ About Course Structure

  • Better to rely on classmates than her in the first place.
  • Graded by few things
  • No problem passing her class as long as you put in the work and show up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but the recent negative reviews are detailed and mostly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CAHM1593 reviews
CAHM1681 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1