AI Rate Professor

English

Julio Leal

ENGL280962 · ENGL1A82994C · ENGL1A · ENG2 · ENGL2 · ENGLA · ENG1A · ENGL1A93641 · ENGLISH1A · 1A · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him only if you like , and do not need highly structured guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teaching styleHeavy reading and essaysPolitics-heavy contentFair but inconsistent gradingParticipation matters
  • Students and frustrating disorganization.
  • The course , and group discussion.
  • Grades can be fair or lenient, but the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students report easy quizzes and , but the A usually requires keeping up with , and participation.

Online evidence is stricter because it mentions no late work, while but includes several easy-A reports.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is not always conceptually hard, but , and unclear directions raise the difficulty.

Online reviews emphasize fast pacing, while in-person reviews range from and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Attendance and participation often matter, though some students .

Online reviews stress strict deadlines, while and some flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

and politics, but many warn against him because of disorganization and .

Online reviews are mildly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

as fair or sometimes lenient, but several students call him tough or unclear.

Format shift

Online comments imply stricter grading policies, while to harsh.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, essays, presentations, and homework.

Format shift

Online workload sounds especially heavy, while but and papers.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

He can be caring and engaging, but many students report , and boring or off-topic classes.

Format shift

Online reviews are limited and moderate, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears , and participation rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly mention papers, readings, quizzes, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with some students praising care and while others report disorganization, political bias, and .

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistent structure and a politics-heavy classroom style.

What students said

“Honestly, my fav professor so far. His class is not easy but he makes it interesting.”
ENG1A
“ , and frequently tardy or absent from his own class.”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online , and limited flexibility.

Main concern

Pacing and no-late-work policies make the online format feel demanding.

What students said

“Tons of reading and late work.”
ENG2
“Julio Leal was overall a good professor but lacked ability to be compassionate about issues regarding late work.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though several mention quizzes and few or hardly any tests.

Reading QuizzesFew TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and few tests, but do not clearly prove a formal exam format or proctoring policy.

Reading QuizzesFew Tests
“ .”
ENG1A
“He always gives you a warning the class before a quiz, so as long as you do the .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The actual work is pretty easy but he is so frustrating that .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class content. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ , and frequently tardy or absent from his own class.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Tons of reading and late work.”

⚖️

52/100

“ , and the essays weren't too bad.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Honestly, my fav professor so far. His class is not easy but he makes it interesting.
  • He takes forever to grade things.
  • Terrible teacher. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you're looking for an A !
  • A lot of work but !
  • workload is heavy but not to hard.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Class Content

  • Too political!
  • If you like politics and arguments this is the class for you.
  • Majority of class was spent on documentaries and discussions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 32 reviews span many years and show repeated themes, even though opinions are highly polarized.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1A10 reviews
ENGL1A7 reviews
ENG26 reviews
ENGL23 reviews
1A1 review
Show 5 more courses
ENGL1A82994C1 review
ENGL1A936411 review
ENGL2809621 review
ENGLA1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values