AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Veronica Lundquist

MATH154 · MATH254 · MATH142 · MATH152 · MATH12 · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
77.14%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Veronica Lundquist if you want a and are ready to keep up with , and exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsCaring and supportiveHeavy homeworkTest heavyFair but demanding
  • Students often praise Veronica Lundquist for , and strong support for math-anxious students.
  • The course is not an easy A because , and .
  • Online reviews are more polarized, with stronger complaints about workload, self-teaching, and proctoring logistics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic for organized students, but reviews repeatedly say , and use help resources.

, while online evidence is more split and includes heavier workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is often challenging, but , and support make it manageable for many students.

In-person students more often credit her teaching for , while online students more often mention self-teaching and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally required, but many reviews say skipping class or missing participation will hurt performance.

, while in-person reviews stress that showing up is important to pass.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because and cares, though workload and .

, while online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

as fair or clear, but several students call her nitpicky or .

Format shift

Online reviews include and fairness praise but , while in-person reviews show the same mixed pattern.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

saying the workload is large even when it helps learning.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy workload, but online complaints and self-teaching.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most detailed reviews describe her as , and especially helpful for students who struggle with math.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide stronger and broader teaching praise, while online reviews range from excellent support to poor course fit.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews mention frequent exams, quizzes, finals, and and labs.

Format shift

, and cheat sheets, while online reviews mention exams every two weeks and proctoring issues.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

44 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

teacher who rewards steady effort.

Main concern

The main risk is falling behind because of , and test-heavy pacing.

What students said

“While it's a hard class, she teaches the material so well, you just have to put in the work.”
MATH12
“There is a good amount of homework, but it helps you learn the material.”
MATH12
“As long as you go to class and .”
MATH12

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report both strong support and serious workload or .

Main concern

Online sections can require heavy independent work and .

What students said

“records every lecture so you can rewatch her support class is a must”
MATH12
“ unless u have time to teach yourself the material”
MATH154
“this teacher decided there was no possible online way to Procter an though its an online course”
MATH152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policies vary by course and format, with student-friendly cheat sheets and but stricter online proctor logistics in one review.

Frequent ExamsQuizzesCheat Sheet AllowedGroup QuizzesCumulative FinalProctor Center Issue

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, with some student-friendly supports such as cheat sheets, formulas, study guides, and group quizzes.

Cheat Sheet AllowedGroup QuizzesFormulas ProvidedStudy GuidesLong Challenging Tests
“Cheat sheet allowed for and back for final).”
MATH12
“She gives you all the formulas on the tests/quizzes and .”
MATH12
“ and challenging”
MATH12

Online

Online reviews clearly mention exams every two weeks, a , and one proctor center dispute, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Frequent ExamsCumulative FinalMandatory QuizzesProctor Center Issue
“the exams, which are every 2 weeks”
MATH154
“The .”
MATH154
“there was no possible online way to Procter an though its an online course”
MATH152

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“While it's a hard class, she teaches the material so well, you just have to put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She is awesome at explaining difficult concepts in several ways so that everyone can understand.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“There is a good amount of homework, but it helps you learn the material.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“If !”

⚖️

54/100

“ , and wants you to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • and thorough.
  • .
  • This instructor is heavy with the lectures but and concise.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • While it's a hard class, she teaches the material so well, you just have to put in the work.
  • As long as you go to class and .
  • She gave a lot of .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Character

  • She is on your side and will provide all she can to help
  • and is really fair and reasonable with what she expects.
  • Veronica was a blessing to have as my math teacher.
  • She seems to really care about her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, with consistent , and exams.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 513
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1229 reviews
MATH15212 reviews
1543 reviews
MATH1422 reviews
MATH1542 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH2542 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

33 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 6 · B 3

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 2