AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Ginger Charles

CJ1 · CJ11 · CJ2 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
91.67%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Strongly consider her for in-person CJ classes, but treat the online experience as less certain.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging CJ StoriesCaring and AccessibleParticipation-DrivenEasy A PotentialOnline Experience Mixed
  • In-person students overwhelmingly praise her engaging lectures, real-world criminal justice experience, and caring style.
  • Grades look very favorable, with many A-range outcomes and one review directly calling the class an easy A.
  • Online evidence is limited and mixed, with one very negative accommodation complaint and one brief positive review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

A grades are common and one student directly calls it an easy A, but participation and keeping up still matter.

Easy A evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content appears approachable because lectures are engaging and practical, though some reading and lecture-heavy material remain.

In-person reviews describe the course as enjoyable and manageable, while online reviews are too limited to judge content difficulty well.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but students .

In-person reviews emphasize discussion and participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students strongly recommend her because , and makes CJ material interesting.

, while online recommendation evidence is mixed and less reliable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

The grade pattern is heavily A-range and students describe the class as manageable, though not completely effortless.

Format shift

Lenient grading evidence is strongest in in-person reviews, while online .

Workload

Light

78/100

Students describe the workload as not too much, but falling behind can still create pressure.

Format shift

, while online reviews give no useful workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students praise her lectures, stories, care, and ability to connect with the class.

Format shift

, while online feedback is mixed because one review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews emphasize lectures, participation, reading, and .

Format shift

and participation matter, while online reviews do not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing engaging lectures, real-world stories, care for students, and enjoyable class discussions.

Main concern

Students who fall behind may need to hustle to catch up.

What students said

“If you are looking for a easy A and interesting as a sign!”
CJ1
“One of the business and how to teach it engagingly!”
CJ11

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

accommodation and one brief positive review.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent online support and accommodation.

What students said

“NOT accommodating. . Thinks she's helping and makes things worse. !!!”
CJ1
“Dr. Charles was an awesome professor.”
CJ11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterms, finals, or other exam policy.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are looking for a easy A and interesting as a sign!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“One of the business and how to teach it engagingly!”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“I really liked professor Charles classes. She made me realize I wanted to be a criminal justice major when I transfer to a 4 year. ”

📈 Grade Value

86/100

“If you are looking for a easy A and interesting as a sign!”

⚠️ Online Risk

45/100

“NOT accommodating. . Thinks she's helping and makes things worse. !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives good lectures and even makes class enjoyable.
  • She made me realize I wanted to be a criminal justice major when I transfer to a 4 year.
  • She can really connect with all the students and always understands where were coming from.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you are looking for a easy A and interesting as a sign!
  • Not too much work but if you fall behind you really have to hustle to get back on track.
  • Class discussions are very opening and fun to be involved in.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She really cares about her students and helps with anything you need.
  • So opened minded and is always willing to go above and beyond for her students.
  • lovely class even offered to write a letter of rec for grad school

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 recent reviews are mostly detailed and consistent, though online evidence is thin and mixed.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CJ15 reviews
CJ114 reviews
CJ23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values