AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael Jordan

PHILO49 · PHILO7 · PHILO10 · PHILO1696797 · PHILO8 · PHILO16 · PHILO4 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
94.44%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy class where steady participation and basic preparation usually pay off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging discussionsClear philosophy lecturesParticipation heavyMostly fair workloadOccasional nitpicky grading
  • Jordan is strongest at and discussion based.
  • Most students recommend him, but a few dislike his content choices, pacing, or .
  • Getting a strong grade is realistic if students attend, read, participate, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

An A is very reachable with study, participation, readings, and papers, but it is not a free grade.

Online reviews show steady weekly tasks, while and prepare.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

He makes hard philosophy accessible, but the , and abstract concepts.

Online evidence stresses organization, while and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly required, but participation is repeatedly important for learning and success.

Participation pressure is much clearer in .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him because , and he cares about the subject.

Both formats are positive, but and pacing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Many students earned high grades, but .

Format shift

Online grading seems clear, while .

Workload

Light

70/100

The workload is usually manageable, with readings, short papers, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly posts and quizzes, while , and readings.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Students usually praise his clarity, humor, passion, and ability to make philosophy engaging.

Format shift

Online reviews praise organization, while and lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention weekly discussions and quizzes, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person , and participation-driven learning with some grading complaints.

Main concern

Some students found the .

What students said

“ .”
PHILO7
“he's a ”
PHILO4
“it is honestly a stress-free class with an easy A if you do study”
PHILO8

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews describe an and interesting materials.

Main concern

, so timing matters.

What students said

“Class consists of and a quiz”
PHILO16
“Nothing was hard to find and the and separated by week.”
PHILO16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests standard tests, quizzes, midterms, and strict proctoring policies.

Weekly QuizzesEasy TestsMidtermFinalPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Easy TestsMidtermFinalIn-Class Quizzes
“2-3 essays + 3 easy tests.”
PHILO4
“1 midterm, 1 final which was basically a midterm.”
PHILO10
“We didn't have a .”
PHILO1696797

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Weekly Quiz
“Class consists of and a quiz”
PHILO16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Incredible class, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“ .”

⚖️

62/100

“he's a nitpicky paper grader- docked everyone at least 1 point”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are incredible, and group oriented.
  • He made it easy to concentrate and understand the complicated nature of philosophy.
  • and he does a great job making super complicated concepts easy to understand and digest.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you show up, pay attention, and do the .
  • it is honestly a stress-free class with an easy A if you do study
  • Do the work, you'll get a B or better.

Theme 3

💬

  • He values participation and .
  • we actually discuss the topics.
  • he made it so every student wanted to participate in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across both formats provide detailed, mostly consistent evidence with a few meaningful dissenting views.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILO106 reviews
PHILO45 reviews
PHILO163 reviews
PHILO83 reviews
PHILO492 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PHILO72 reviews
PHILO16967971 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 9

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1