AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Criminal Justice

Phil Carr

CJCJ20 · CJLAW · CJ9 · LAWCJ2 · CJ1 · CJ7652 · CJ20 · CJ5 · CJ7615 · CJ41 · CJ2 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a respected Criminal Justice professor whose classes are manageable when you keep up with reading and quizzes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear And Interesting LecturesEasy If You Do The WorkCaring And ResponsiveOnline QuizzesLaw Enforcement Experience
  • Students consistently describe Carr as , and .
  • Grades are very attainable when students read, complete quizzes, participate, and submit assignments.
  • Online and in-person reviews both praise him, but online reviews mention more reading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very realistic if , and submit the written work.

Both formats support an attainable A, while online reviews add that the midterm and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The and manageable, but students still need regular reading and .

In-person reviews call the course straightforward, while online and some difficult exam questions.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

but not always required, though participation and keeping up with work matter.

In-person reviews mention that class can be missed but helps, while online reviews emphasize participation in assignments.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students recommend him because , and fair when students do the work.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with and more consistent evidence base.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students often say quizzes, essays, and grades are easy or straightforward when they complete the required work.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews more often describe easy quizzes and clear paths to passing.

Workload

Light

72/100

, and essays, but most students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

Online reviews show a repeatable weekly workload, while and online quizzes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly call , and highly credible from law enforcement experience.

Format shift

Both formats praise his teaching, with in-person reviews giving especially strong evidence about lectures and classroom engagement.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix online quizzes, reading responses, essays, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussions, essays, midterm, and final, while and reading responses.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and practical experience, with quizzes and reading as the main routine.

Main concern

Students need to read and keep up with online quizzes, and .

What students said

“You don't have to go to class, his power points are mainly the summary of the book.”
CJ2
“ and takes time to answer questions and .”
CJ1
“Hs classes are not extremely hard but you have to earn your A.”
LAWCJ2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive and describe an easy structure with , and quick help from Carr.

Main concern

The midterm and .

What students said

“very easy class, read the .”
CJ1
“The midterm and .”
CJ1
“as long as you participate in all the ”
CJ2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention online quizzes and some exams, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Online QuizzesMidterm And Final MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam proctoring or book policy.

Online QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“You do have an but are easy.”
CJ2
“all the ; read the chapter before taking the quiz because all the answers are in the book no tricks.”
CJ20

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes plus a midterm and final, but .

Online QuizzesMidterm And Final MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“The midterm and .”
CJ1
“questions are sometimes niche and ambiguous.”
CJ1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“ and takes time to answer questions and .”

👍 Recommendation Strength

90/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Path

84/100

“As long as you do the work you will pass his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes class interesting with his lectures and shares a lot of his experiences with us.
  • , and his notes are great.
  • Great guy. He is funny and makes things interesting.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • His class is not hard, all the and answers are right in the book, you just have to read here and there.
  • Hs classes are not extremely hard but you have to earn your A.
  • Be sure and read the chapters. , but no slack if you miss one of them.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • he cares for his students and if you come up to him and ask for help/advice he is willing to listen.
  • !!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 reviews span many years, show consistent praise, and include , and grades.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CJ18 reviews
CJ24 reviews
CJ203 reviews
CJ412 reviews
CJ92 reviews
Show 6 more courses
CJ51 review
CJ76151 review
CJ76521 review
CJCJ201 review
CJLAW1 review
LAWCJ21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values