AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Adrianne Saxton

HS10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

unless you can handle an online course with little teaching support and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GraderPoor CommunicationLow Teaching ValueReading Heavy
  • The only review describes the online class as mostly posted videos and health website links.
  • The student received an A but as harsh and unfair.
  • Recommendation confidence is low because the evidence comes from only one online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

The student earned an A, but harsh and an A feel unreliable.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The content sounds intellectually light because the class is described as posted TED talks and health website links.

Only the online format has evidence, and it suggests easy content rather than strong instruction.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only online evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student strongly implies a poor experience because of and poor communication.

The recommendation judgment comes only from one negative online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The review directly calls her a and describes a late penalty after a file access issue.

Format shift

Only the , and it is strongly negative.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The and federal health links rather than complex projects.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The review describes little real teaching support and poor handling of an assignment issue.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and it is sharply negative about the teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only specific assessment mentioned is an assignment resubmission and .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with no in-person assessment information.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review , and harsh assignment grading.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“This class is just a series of posted ted talks and federal health website links.”
HS10
“Professor Saxton is a .”
HS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Saxton is a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“This class is just a series of posted ted talks and federal health website links.”

⚖️

10/100

“Professor Saxton is a .”

🚩 Communication Issue

5/100

“She asked me to resubmit an assignment because she could not access it and then marked it late and refused to give me an answer as to why.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This class is just a series of posted ted talks and federal health website links.
  • Get ready to read

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Professor Saxton is a .
  • She asked me to resubmit an assignment because she could not access it and then marked it late and refused to give me an answer as to why.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on one review from one online course format.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values