AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Shirley Flores-Munoz

WOMWS5 · WS10 · HIST14 · WS5 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take Flores-Munoz only if you can manage disorganization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy homeworkFlexible gradingInteresting materialMixed teaching
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising her kindness and passion while .
  • The workload is the biggest problem, especially readings, papers, book reports, and changing due dates.
  • Grades can still be attainable because some comments mention flexible due dates, , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades can be easy because of lenient policies and , but the .

The online review reports unclear assignments, while through lenient late work and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is often described as easy or interesting, but poor organization and .

, while in-person evidence is mixed between easy content and frustrating workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

68/100

if , but most reviews do not clearly define the policy.

Attendance flexibility evidence comes only from in-person reviews; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation depends on tolerance for disorganization, because students split between praising her passion and warning that the .

The only online review is negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Several students report flexible due dates, lenient late work, no quizzes, and .

Format shift

Leniency evidence is mainly in person, while the online review .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and work that interferes with other classes.

Format shift

Both online and , but in-person reviews give much richer workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching is inconsistent because some students find her wise and passionate, while .

Format shift

The online review is strongly negative, while criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

The class appears driven mostly by homework, reading, papers, book reports, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is mainly from in-person reviews, with the online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for interesting material and kindness but and poor organization.

Main concern

The workload and shifting due dates can make the class frustrating even when the grade is possible.

What students said

“Tons of work, more than any class i ever took”
WS10
“The .”
WS5
“She is very lenient on late work.”
WOMWS5

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and , and rudeness.

Main concern

Online instructions and syllabus organization may be .

What students said

“The .”
HIST14
“Syllabus is impossible to understand as well as .”
HIST14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk seems low where described, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

No Tests Or Quizzes Reported In One ReviewMidterm And Final Answers ProvidedNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceHomework-Heavy Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

one section and a midterm and final with answers provided, but policy may vary by course.

No Tests Or Quizzes In One ReviewMidterm And Final Answers ProvidedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and final which she gives the answers to.”
HIST14

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the format, or final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tons of work, more than any class i ever took, teacher is nice but this women in america class is so much work i could barely focus on my other classes i was taking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Warning

22/100

“Tons of work, more than any class i ever took”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“SO UNORGANIZED! She changed the due dates for the entire syllabus 3 times!”

⚖️

70/100

“She is very lenient on late work.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Expect lots of homework and book reports .
  • Be prepared to complete a crazy amount of homework !
  • She gives tons of homework and hours of reading.

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • Syllabus is impossible to understand as well as .
  • The and developed.
  • made for ongoing frustration for many of us in the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Positive Experiences

  • She's a humble, wise lady.
  • The class material is very interesting.
  • She may give u a lot of readings, but you learned a lot from her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews include detailed and recurring themes across years, though opinions are polarized and one online review limits format confidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

WS104 reviews
WS54 reviews
WOMWS53 reviews
HIST142 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1