AI Rate Professor

Construction

Mark Van Meter

CEM151EL · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you prioritize an easy grade over strong instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterNice but unclearLow learning valueAssistants teach oftenEasy gradingMissed classes
  • The only but poor at explaining core material.
  • The course appears easy to pass, but the student says they learned little.
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

The student earned an A and rated difficulty very low, so the grade appears easy despite weak teaching.

The only .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

80/100

The course seems low difficulty, though actually learn.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review says he misses classes, but it does .

There is only in-person evidence, and it does not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The student does not describe meaningful learning and says assistants teach much of the course.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

An A with very low difficulty and few .

Format shift

This is .

Workload

Light

75/100

The review implies low difficulty and few graded items, with no heavy workload reported.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The and that assistants teach a lot of the class.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review mentions group projects and being graded by few things, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single in-person review describes an easy class with and heavy reliance on assistants.

Main concern

The main concern is poor instruction and low learning value.

What students said

“He is a but .”
cem151el
“I didn't really learn anything.”
cem151el

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I didn't really learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching quality, grade ease, and learning value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He is a but .”

📉 Learning Value

20/100

“I didn't really learn anything.”

⚖️ Grade Ease

85/100

“Group projects”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a but .
  • So his assistants end up teaching a lot of it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Graded by few things
  • I took Mark for a few different classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the analysis is useful but weakly supported.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

cem151el1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values