AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jay Krause

MATH4 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can handle tough grading and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderMixed Teaching QualityLecture HeavyTry-To-Pass Course
  • passable with effort.
  • and very confusing lectures.
  • The safest expectation is a hard math class with uneven instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but and needing real effort rather than an easy path.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course feels challenging because students , and low-information lectures.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is mixed but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , though quizzes had some flexibility.

Only in-person reviews mention .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on tolerance for and inconsistent teaching quality.

and directly conflict on whether the professor is worth taking.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Both reviews tag or describe him as a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

One review mentions lots of homework while the and quizzes.

Format shift

The workload concern appears only in in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Teaching quality is highly inconsistent, ranging from good explanations to hard-to-understand lectures.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, lectures, and homework but do not prove an .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split, with and another warning strongly against the class.

Main concern

and teaching clarity is inconsistent.

What students said

“Even though he grade really hard he still was good at explaining things.”
MATH4
“His teaching style is hard to understand and he sucked at explaining concepts.”
MATH4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention flexible quizzes but do not clearly prove the .

Quiz FlexibilityExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Quiz Flexibility
“He was somewhat flexible with the .”
MATH4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . BUYER BEWARE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“His teaching style is hard to understand and he sucked at explaining concepts.”

⚖️

25/100

“Even though he grade really hard he still was good at explaining things.”

👍 Recommendation Level

45/100

“All I would say if you actually tried you are going to pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he still was good at explaining things.
  • His teaching style is hard to understand and he sucked at explaining concepts.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Even though he grade really hard
  • if you actually tried you are going to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly disagree about teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH42 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values