AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael Jordon

PHILO16 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you want a discussion-heavy philosophy class, but if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDiscussion DrivenTough GraderPaper HeavyThought-Provoking LecturesParticipation Matters
  • Students praise the discussions and lectures, especially when the class participates.
  • , and in-class writing, with strict policies and .
  • The course fits students who want open discussion more than students seeking an easy grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but strict grading, multiple papers, exams, in-class writing, no late work, and minimal make it effort-heavy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The course is intellectually manageable but , and exams.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation matters and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students , but grading complaints create real hesitation.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students describe him as a and minimal .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload includes papers, exams, in-class writing, and preparation, but comments do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most comments praise his lectures and discussion style, though one student reports a .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessment appears split between papers, in-class writing, and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a discussion-centered class with engaging lectures but and meaningful writing demands.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Mr. Jordan's lectures are interesting and thought-provoking.”
philo-16
“He's a and takes 1-2 months to return papers”
philo-16
“if the class talks the semester will be awesome”
philo-16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention three exams and , but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, or closed-book policies.

Three ExamsStudy Guides HelpReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and say study guides make them easier, but exam rules are not clearly described.

Three ExamsStudy Guides HelpExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“The class has in-class writings, 3 papers, and 3 exams.”
philo-16
“ if you use his study guides.”
philo-16

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is one of if not the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class fit; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Mr. Jordan's lectures are interesting and thought-provoking.”

⚖️

25/100

“He's a and takes 1-2 months to return papers”

👍 Recommendation Fit

68/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Jordan's lectures are interesting and thought-provoking.
  • Overall great lectures, if the class talks the semester will be awesome.
  • You read and watch the materials before class and then show up and discuss your views on topics with other students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He's a and takes 1-2 months to return papers
  • No late work, minimal .
  • There are 4 papers and in class writing assignments, but you write about your opinion.

Theme 3

💬 About Class Fit

  • Great prof if
  • he treats his students as if they were Uni level so if you aren't prepared for that fair warning.
  • This was such an enlighten and free class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only four reviews, but they are recent overall and , and workload.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

philo-164 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1