AI Rate Professor

Women's Studies

Teresa Macedo

SOC1 · WS1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a meaningful sociology or women's studies course and can keep up with substantial reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy ReadingCaring ProfessorClear MaterialsDiscussion FocusedMixed Lecture Clarity
  • Most students praise her care, perspective, and course structure.
  • The course is reading-heavy and not a casual easy GE.
  • Grades are attainable with , and study materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are common, but students repeatedly , and real effort.

Online reviews emphasize clear prompts and , while in-person reviews emphasize study materials, feedback, and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The , but the and lecture density make it more than an easy GE.

Online students mainly cite time pressure, while , and lecture clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention participation and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove a .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because , and .

, while online reviews are positive but more workload-sensitive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades appear achievable, with , and , but papers and quizzes still require work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and clear criteria, while and study materials.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Multiple students describe lots of reading, quizzes, and papers, with one saying the class took much more time than expected.

Format shift

Both formats report substantial reading, with the online negative review stressing time burden most strongly.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students usually describe her as caring, insightful, and organized, though a few find lectures scattered or frustrating.

Format shift

In-person comments show stronger personal connection, while online comments focus more on clarity of directions.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment appears , and some tests rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews cite reading quizzes and papers, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and care, though readings and lectures can be demanding.

Main concern

Students need to manage lots of reading and occasional lecture confusion.

What students said

“I learned a lot in her class; she aligned the chapters closely with the concepts she wanted us to understand.”
SOC1
“Her lectures are all over the place and the .”
SOC1

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , but also a heavy time commitment.

Main concern

The online workload can feel heavier than expected.

What students said

“It took much more time than expected and made it difficult to focus on my other classes.”
SOC1
“ .”
SOC1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support quizzes, papers, and photo essay exams, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Reading QuizzesPhoto Essay MidtermPhoto Essay FinalPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final plus quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Photo Essay MidtermPhoto Essay FinalReading Quizzes
“The and .”
SOC1
“Allot of reading and .”
SOC1

Online

Online reviews mention reading quizzes and papers, but do not clearly .

Reading QuizzesPapers
“ you pass the reading quizzes.”
SOC1
“There are two 4 page papers assigned but the and straightforward.”
SOC1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're a Soc or Women's Studies major, her class is a must.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ , and relates all of her material to personal and current events.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“There is a lot of reading and you are quizzed on the readings.”

👍 Recommendation Level

80/100

“ why society is the way it is and broadening their perspective.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and relates all of her material to personal and current events.
  • and is very accommodating.
  • Her lectures are all over the place and the .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There are 6 readings assigned every 2 weeks.
  • There is a lot of reading but .
  • It took much more time than expected and made it difficult to focus on my other classes.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • As long as you put in some effort you'll do well.
  • Lots of opportunities.
  • The but there's only two and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews span several years, include both formats, and and teaching style despite some mixed opinions.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOC18 reviews
WS11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1