AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Luke Simcik

5A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you have no alternative and can handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNightmare experiencePop quizzesFew graded items
  • The only review is strongly negative and warns students away.
  • The review suggests high difficulty with limited graded opportunities.
  • There is too little evidence to judge teaching style beyond a severe negative experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

The review gives no grade evidence and and few graded items, so getting an A looks risky.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course appears challenging because the only review reports high difficulty and a negative class experience.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student voice strongly warns against taking the class.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Few graded items and , but details are limited.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The review does not list workload volume, but and high difficulty suggest a stressful course.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review describes the professor as a nightmare with no positive teaching evidence.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

The review tags pop quizzes and few graded items, suggesting assessments drive the grade.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and gives no positive teaching evidence.

Main concern

Students may face a very negative and stressful class experience.

What students said

“this guy is a nightmare!”
5A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format beyond a pop quiz concern.

Pop Quizzes Mentioned

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor goes by Lalu, look up Lalu Simcik. Wish I had known before taking class, this guy is a nightmare!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the dominant negative warning. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“this guy is a nightmare!”

👍 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“Wish I had known before taking class, this guy is a nightmare!”

⚖️

25/100

“Professor goes by Lalu, look up Lalu Simcik. Wish I had known before taking class, this guy is a nightmare!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • this guy is a nightmare!
  • Wish I had known before taking class, this guy is a nightmare!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

, so the signal is strong in tone but weak in breadth.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

5A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values