Is this an easy A?
WalkInThePark
94/100Getting an A appears very easy because multiple students explicitly say Easy A, with open-note tests and .
Online evidence strongly supports an easy A, while but are less consistent.
Cabrillo College · Anthropology
ANTH1 · ANTH1L · ANTH103 · ANTHR1 · ANTHONL · ANTHR6024 · ANTH101 · 11 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Getting an A appears very easy because multiple students explicitly say Easy A, with open-note tests and limited weekly work when readings are kept up.
Online evidence strongly supports an easy A, while in-person-flagged reviews also include easy A comments but are less consistent.
Is the course easy?
The course content is usually described as straightforward, simple, and reading-based rather than intellectually difficult.
Online reviews mostly call the course easy, while in-person-flagged reviews range from very simple to one difficult-to-follow lab.
Is attendance flexible?
There is no clear classroom attendance policy, but some online reviews mention required login time or weekly participation expectations.
Online evidence mentions weekly modules and login expectations, while in-person-flagged evidence does not clearly establish an attendance rule.
Is this professor recommended?
Students generally recommend her because the course is easy, grading is clear, and exams are student-friendly despite slow grading complaints.
Online reviews are strongly recommended overall, while in-person-flagged reviews are more mixed and less detailed.
Course guide
Grading
Generous
88/100
Grading appears generous because students repeatedly report easy A outcomes, open-note exams, and clear grading criteria.
Format shift
Online reviews provide the strongest grading evidence, while in-person-flagged reviews also mention easy A but include weaker detail.
Workload
Light
84/100
Most students describe only weekly readings, quizzes, forums, or a few assignments, with one review saying about one hour a week was enough.
Format shift
Online reviews mostly show a light workload, while one in-person-flagged lab review reports time-consuming and unclear work.
Teaching experience
Good
76/100
Students often find her clear, caring, and accessible, but slow grading and low presence reduce the teaching score.
Format shift
Online reviews include both strong praise and complaints about absence, while in-person-flagged reviews are too mixed and sparse for a stronger conclusion.
Assessment method
Balanced
58/100
Assessment appears to mix quizzes, readings, forums, homework, a midterm, and a final rather than relying only on exams.
Format shift
Online reviews give the clearest assessment mix, while in-person-flagged reviews mostly mention tests, quizzes, and homework.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person-flagged reviews are mixed because several describe online coursework, with easy open-book tests balanced by one time-consuming lab complaint and two vague reviews.
Main concern
Evidence is less reliable because several in-person-flagged reviews discuss online classes and some have little detail.
What students said
“Took the online class, it was very straightforward and simple.”
“Also all tests are open note, open book.”
“Weekly assignments and reading are not clearly defined and due dates are a bit vague.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter
Online reviews are mostly very positive, with repeated easy A comments and open-note testing, but some frustration about slow grading and low instructor presence.
Main concern
Slow grading and limited instructor presence can make progress hard to track.
What students said
“If you keep up with the weekly module readings and discussion posts, you'll get an easy A.”
“The tests are always open note and she usually gives you more than enough time on them”
“Takes weeks to grade anything.”
Exam style
Exam evidence is strongly student-friendly because multiple reviews mention open-note or open-book tests, including midterm and final formats.
Assessment risk
StudentFriendly
90/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person-flagged reviews explicitly mention open-note or open-book tests, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.
“Open note/book tests and quizzes with two homework assignments.”
“Also all tests are open note, open book.”
“Tests cover a lot of reading.”
Online reviews explicitly support open-note tests, open-book or open-note midterm and final, automated tests, and generous time, but do not clearly prove webcam or proctoring rules.
“The tests are always open note and she usually gives you more than enough time on them”
“Open book/note midterm and final (online).”
“all tests are automated online”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Easiest teacher I have had at LCC. Open book/note midterm and final (online).”
“Her communication is also great.”
“Highly recommended if you're looking for an easy A.”
“This class is an easy A. Just keep up with the readings and forums.”
“The tests are always open note and she usually gives you more than enough time on them”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
11
Recent reviews read by the AI
11
Lifetime ratings
73/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is medium because there are 11 reviews with consistent easy-course evidence, but many are old, some are vague, and format labels conflict with review text.
Inside 11 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
5 reported outcomes
A 4
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 1