AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Katherine Davidson-Sprado

ANTH1 · ANTH1L · ANTH103 · ANTHR1 · ANTHONL · ANTHR6024 · ANTH101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

Take this professor if you want a low-stress anthropology course with open-note testing, but expect and uneven organization.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AOpen Note TestsStraightforward CourseworkSlow GradingLight Workload
  • Most students describe the class as very easy if they keep up with , and forums.
  • Exams are repeatedly described as open note or .
  • The main complaints are slow grading, vague organization in one lab review, and limited instructor presence in some online sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Getting an A appears very easy because multiple students explicitly say Easy A, with open-note tests and .

Online evidence strongly supports an easy A, while but are less consistent.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

86/100

The course content is usually described as straightforward, simple, and .

Online reviews mostly call the course easy, while difficult-to-follow lab.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

There , but some online reviews mention required login time or weekly participation expectations.

Online evidence mentions weekly modules and login expectations, while in-person-flagged evidence does not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students generally recommend her because the course , and exams are student-friendly despite slow grading complaints.

, while in-person-flagged reviews are more mixed and less detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

because students repeatedly report easy A outcomes, open-note exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest grading evidence, while but include weaker detail.

Workload

Light

84/100

Most students describe only weekly readings, quizzes, forums, or a a week was enough.

Format shift

Online reviews mostly show a light workload, while and unclear work.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Students , and accessible, but and low presence reduce the teaching score.

Format shift

Online reviews include both strong praise and complaints about absence, while and sparse for a stronger conclusion.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment , and a final rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest assessment mix, while , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-flagged reviews are mixed because several describe online coursework, with easy open-book and two vague reviews.

Main concern

Evidence is less reliable because and some have little detail.

What students said

“Took the online class, it was very straightforward and simple.”
ANTHONL
“ .”
ANTH1
“Weekly assignments and and due dates are a bit vague.”
ANTH1L

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are mostly very positive, with repeated easy A comments and open-note testing, but and low instructor presence.

Main concern

and limited instructor presence can make progress hard to track.

What students said

“If you keep up with the and .”
ANTH103
“The and she usually gives you more than enough time on them”
ANTH103
“Takes weeks to grade anything.”
ANTH103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is strongly student-friendly because multiple reviews mention open-note or and .

Open Note TestsOpen Book ExamsOnline MidtermOnline FinalGenerous Time

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person-flagged reviews explicitly mention open-note or open-book tests, but they .

Open Note TestsOpen Book TestsTests Cover Reading
“ and .”
ANTHONL
“ .”
ANTH1
“ .”
ANTH1L

Online

Online reviews explicitly support open-note tests, open-book or open-note midterm and , and generous time, but do not clearly prove webcam or .

Open Note TestsOpen Book MidtermOpen Book FinalGenerous TimeAutomated Online Tests
“The and she usually gives you more than enough time on them”
ANTH103
“ and .”
ANTH103
“ ”
ANTH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easiest teacher I have had at LCC. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Her communication is also great.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“ if you're looking for an easy A.”

📘 Easy A Evidence

94/100

“This class is an easy A. Just keep up with the readings and forums.”

📝

90/100

“The and she usually gives you more than enough time on them”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class, about 3 things to do per week, easy and
  • This class is an easy A. Just keep up with the readings and forums.
  • Easy A

Theme 2

🧑‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I really loved her class and felt like I learned a lot!
  • Her communication is also great.
  • She was probably the quickest professor to address my needs I have had as well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • She doesn't grade things in a timely manner, so if you want to know your grade throughout the course, good luck.
  • Professor expects you to log on at least 8 hours a week but is non-existent herself.
  • Weekly assignments and and due dates are a bit vague.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

73/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are 11 reviews with consistent easy-course evidence, but many are old, some are vague, and format labels conflict with review text.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTH1035 reviews
ANTH11 review
ANTH1011 review
ANTH1L1 review
ANTHONL1 review
Show 2 more courses
ANTHR11 review
ANTHR60241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1