Is this an easy A?
EasyA
88/100Getting an A appears very achievable because students report , and grades mostly in the A range, though showing up and .
because there are zero online reviews.
JOURN23 · JOURN21 · MASSCOMM · JOURN23A · JOURN121 · JOURN7492 · JOURNALISM · JOURN23AND53 · 20 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Getting an A appears very achievable because students report easy quizzes, low difficulty, and grades mostly in the A range, though showing up and completing assignments still matters.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are zero online reviews.
Is the course easy?
The course content is usually described as easy, discussion-based, and fun, with limited signs of technical or conceptual intensity.
All course easiness evidence comes from in-person classes.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance does not sound harshly enforced, but weekly quizzes and comments about showing up make attendance useful for success.
Only in-person reviews discuss attendance, and they suggest attendance is recommended rather than strictly mandatory.
Is this professor recommended?
Students strongly recommend him because he is inspiring, experienced, caring, entertaining, and helpful with real journalism opportunities.
The recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Generous
86/100
Grades are mostly A-range and students repeatedly describe the class as easy or straightforward.
Format shift
All grading evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Workload
Light
80/100
Workload seems light overall, with quizzes, essays, projects, and presentations mentioned but little evidence of heavy pressure.
Format shift
All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Teaching experience
Excellent
91/100
Students consistently praise his real-world experience, stories, enthusiasm, care, and ability to inspire career interest.
Format shift
Teaching quality evidence is entirely from in-person reviews.
Assessment method
Balanced
45/100
Assessment appears to mix quizzes, tests, essays, presentations, and projects rather than relying only on exams.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews mention assessment structure.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews are highly positive, emphasizing inspiration, easy grading, real journalism experience, and a fun but sometimes loosely organized class.
Main concern
The main concern is that organization and structured content can be thin for students seeking a rigorous technical journalism course.
What students said
“Brad is by far the best journalism teacher I have ever had.”
“Definately an easy class but boring!”
“Super fun class, but don't expect to get through a lot of material.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Reviews mention easy student-made quizzes and two tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.
Assessment risk
Standard
65/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention easy quizzes and two tests, but exam rules and proctoring policies are not clearly proven.
“The quizzes were pretty easy, especially since they were all made by the students.”
“there are quizzes every week so make sure to attend class!”
“we had 1 oral report, 1 video response essay, 1 research essay, 1 final essay, & 2 tests.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“This class is an absolute gem!”
“Brad is by far the best journalism teacher I have ever had.”
“I highly recommend everyone to take his class!”
“Show him respect and show up to class and you will pass this class.”
“The class is not very organized; we had 1 oral report, 1 video response essay, 1 research essay, 1 final essay, & 2 tests.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
20
Recent reviews read by the AI
20
Lifetime ratings
88/100
Evidence confidence
Credibility is high because 20 in-person reviews span many years and show a consistent pattern of strong praise with repeated notes about easy difficulty and loose structure.
Inside 20 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
10 reported outcomes
A+ 3 · A 5 · A- 1
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 1