AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Anthropology

Beth Roselyn

ANTH1L · ANTHRO1 · ANTHR1 · 1H · ANTHR2 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
36.84%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if , and a demanding structure, especially online.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough picky graderReading intensiveMixed teaching qualityBetter in person than online
  • Online students frequently describe the class as , and harsher than it needs to be.
  • In-person reviews are mixed, with several strong teaching compliments but and .
  • Getting an A is possible, but students often say it requires adjusting to strict expectations and staying on top of every detail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students can earn A grades, but the , and adapting to strict grading.

Online reviews make the A feel especially costly, while but more teaching support.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material is made difficult by , and demanding expectations for an intro or one-unit class.

Online comments describe the course as more tedious and self-taught, while but sometimes engaging lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but participation, punctuality, and staying current are clearly important.

Online evidence focuses on weekly work and discussions, while , and not coming late.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because the workload and grading feel .

Online recommendations are mostly poor, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students repeatedly call her grading tough, picky, harsh, erratic, and focused on small details.

Format shift

describing it more intensely.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of reading, papers, labs, quizzes, discussions, and be lighter.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially excessive, while .

Teaching experience

Average

43/100

Teaching quality is highly polarized, with strong in-person praise but many online students describing dry content, poor structure, and self-teaching.

Format shift

, while online teaching is often criticized as ineffective.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments , and at least one group final project.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, discussion posts, labs, and exams, while , and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split between excellent, engaging teaching and , and .

Main concern

and grades tough.

What students said

“ . She is a .”
ANTHR1
“Her lectures are eloquent and well-paced, and her sense of humor is wonderful.”
ANTHR1
“Graded tough and covers a lot of material.”
ANTHR1

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing excessive , and weak online teaching structure.

Main concern

Students often feel they are teaching themselves while doing too much work for the course level.

What students said

“Tons of . Youre basically teaching yourself.”
ANTH1L
“very hard, like she punishing you for taking it online.”
ANTHR1
“This class is very and lectures.”
ANTHR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, exams, and a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesThree ExamsQuiz-Based ExamsGroup Final Project

Assessment risk

Standard

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Three ExamsGroup Final Project
“There was only 3 exams and she gives you the material you need to be prepared.”
ANTHR1
“The :(”
ANTHR1

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and exams based on quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesThree ExamsQuiz-Based Exams
“1 quiz per week based on readings, 3 .”
ANTHR1
“There are .”
ANTHR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you have hours of free time every week for only this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“Horrendous work load.”

⚖️

24/100

“She's a and is very picky.”

🎯 Teaching Split

43/100

“Her lectures are eloquent and well-paced, and her sense of humor is wonderful.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Tons of .
  • She assigns way too much for work for a single unit class.
  • Be prepared to work hard.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • details, it is erratic and not based on any clear standard.
  • she's not a but not an easy grade.
  • it is a challenge to .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Roselyn is an amazing teacher.
  • Incredibly dry presentation of content, condescending attitude towards students, and just seems like she doesn't care
  • Dr. Roselyn makes sure you understand everything!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is supported by 22 detailed reviews split across online and , and grading strictness.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ANTHR117 reviews
ANTH1L2 reviews
1H1 review
ANTHR21 review
ANTHRO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values