AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Kelli Horner

STEMCNTR1 · ENGR1A · 1A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

, unless you only need a low-effort grade and can tolerate weak structure.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganized course structurePoor instructionEasy AApproachable in support roleLow recommendation
  • Most reviews criticize organization, flow, and instruction quality.
  • The class may be easy to pass, but students often say it lacks value.
  • One positive review praises her approachability and motivation in a STEM center or PREP role.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

One review explicitly calls it an easy A, and the low difficulty ratings suggest grades are not hard to earn.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course is described as easy or high-school level rather than intellectually demanding.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because they describe the instruction and organization as poor.

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear easy to obtain, but that leniency does not offset the poor learning experience.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

The workload appears light because students describe the class as easy and not academically demanding.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

and amateur or fragmented instruction.

Format shift

review focused on approachability outside a standard course.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether the .

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing disorganization, poor instruction, and low academic value despite one strong support-centered review.

Main concern

Students report weak organization and poor instruction.

What students said

“The .”
ENGR1A
“It was an easy A if that means anything.”
1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rules, open-book status, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . The instruction was amateur and fragmented.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, grade ease, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“The instruction was amateur and fragmented.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“Look for a serious surveying course elsewhere.”

📈 Grade Ease

84/100

“It was an easy A if that means anything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • The instruction was amateur and fragmented.
  • I felt that I didn't get much out of the class even though she .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • It was an easy A if that means anything.
  • If you want a high-school level instructor then Kelli is it.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • !
  • She's very motivating, and always there for the students!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small and somewhat old, but four of five reviews share a consistent negative pattern.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR1A2 reviews
STEMCNTR12 reviews
1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values