AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

John Saunders

CHEM302 · CHEM3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you can learn independently and tolerate poor communication, unstable deadlines, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprofessionalTough GraderPoor CommunicationBuggy Paid PlatformMinimal Teaching
  • Both online reviews strongly .
  • Students report poor communication, inaccessible support, and .
  • The course appears expensive and frustrating because a paid , and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A looks very difficult because reviews describe tough grading, no curve or , poor teaching, and unstable deadlines.

All evidence comes from online reviews because there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The chemistry content is made and exams not fully covered in class, and weak support.

Only online reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Online , and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

2/100

Students explicitly say to avoid him because of unprofessional , and minimal teaching.

Recommendation evidence is entirely online and uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Reviews describe tough grading, no or curve for the class, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and exams appear stressful because dates changed without notice and the testing platform was buggy.

Format shift

Only online reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students describe minimal teaching, poor coverage of , and unprofessional communication.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely online and consistently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams through an online platform.

Format shift

Only online reviews describe assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are uniformly negative, citing minimal , and a buggy paid testing platform.

Main concern

The main concern is that students felt unsupported while , and website.

What students said

“ .”
CHEM302
“He uses a buggy website for test taking and homework.”
CHEM3
“ .”
CHEM3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and changing dates, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser.

Buggy Testing WebsiteChanging Exam DatesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention exams on a buggy paid website with changing dates, but .

Buggy Testing WebsiteChanging Exam Dates
“He uses a buggy website for test taking and homework.”
CHEM3
“He will change the date of hw, quizzes and .”
CHEM302

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online course structure. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Some lectures didn't cover all the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

2/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“He was unprofessional, in a email this semester he said he has given and , but wont do it for my class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He had a few short video lecture with minimal teaching
  • .
  • Some lectures didn't cover all the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He will change the date of hw, quizzes and .
  • He uses a buggy website for test taking and homework.
  • The website costs money for the students and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 2 reviews, though both are recent, detailed, and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM31 review
CHEM3021 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1