AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Presentacion Villapa

154B · MATH98897 · MATH12 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you value and can tolerate inconsistent explanations, but avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditClear GradingMixed Teaching QualityCares About StudentsAttendance Matters
  • Students agree she offers , which improves grade chances.
  • Teaching quality is sharply mixed, ranging from clear and .
  • The course is not effortless, but and keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is achievable with effort because she gives lots of , but .

All evidence is In person, with no Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content seems standard, but students.

Only In person evidence exists, and it is mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

The Skip class? You won't pass tag and and participation are important.

Only In person evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and caring support, but recommendations are limited by serious teaching clarity complaints.

Only In person evidence exists, and it is split between two positive reviews and one negative review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Multiple reviews mention and clear grading criteria, making grades more forgiving despite mixed teaching.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists, and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Reviews do not describe overwhelming workload, but match assignments.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists, and workload evidence is limited.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Teaching quality is mixed because two students praise clarity and care while one calls her the .

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists, and it is sharply divided.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, participation, tests, cheat sheets, and , suggesting a mixed assessment structure.

Format shift

Only In person evidence exists, and it supports a balanced method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for and caring but .

Main concern

Teaching clarity may vary, especially for students .

What students said

“gives lots of and really cares about students.”
MATH12
“ detail and has a sense of humor.”
154B
“ .”
MATH98897

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The sheet on tests, which makes exams more student-friendly, while other exam details are not proven.

Cheat Sheet On TestsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person evidence says she allows a cheat sheet on tests, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring rules, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Cheat Sheet On Tests
“She does give and a .”
MATH98897

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does give and a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“ detail and has a sense of humor.”

⚖️

76/100

“gives lots of and really cares about students.”

📚 Learning Risk

48/100

“Her notes are useless to the homework and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • detail and has a sense of humor.
  • The .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • gives lots of and really cares about students.
  • She does give and a .
  • Her notes are useless to the homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium-low because there are only 3 reviews, but they contain specific and , and exams.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

154B1 review
MATH121 review
MATH988971 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values