AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Abe Berman

MATH4 · MATH5C · MATH3 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take him only if you can self-study math well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing professorSelf-study requiredTest heavyGenerous review sheetsLong dry lectures
  • Reviews are sharply split, with two students praising grades and three strongly criticizing teaching quality.
  • Students who already understand the material and and .
  • A and limited help with questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students report easy A results with , and review sheets, but others struggled badly and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content becomes harder because lectures are fast, dry, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation and , but reviews do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most detailed comments warn against him because the .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and , but outcomes range from A+ to D+ and C+.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and major test weight.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Several students , and unhelpful when questions are asked.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

, and students repeatedly mention exam reviews and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with strong grade-related praise but serious complaints about lectures and support.

Main concern

Students may get lost if they rely on lectures to learn the material.

What students said

“Read his notes, hand in homework, and do the .”
MATH5C
“ if you want someone to teach you.”
MATH4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews prove a test-heavy class with review sheets, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book policies.

Test HeavyExam ReviewsReview Sheets

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove specific exam policies.

Test HeavyExam Review Sheets
“do the .”
MATH5C
“ .”
MATH4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want someone to teach you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Abe lacks good teaching skills, but he easily makes up for it in other aspects.”

⚖️

62/100

“being a .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are quick and no questions because he doesn't like them.
  • His lectures are long & dry.
  • He teaches the material the way he understands & skips important steps.
  • Not a good teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Easy A, had him for 5A & 5C both solid A+!!!
  • Read his notes, hand in homework, and do the .
  • You can pass if you self study a lot

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • .
  • giving you a review sheet that covers everything that's going to be on the exam

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across multiple courses give useful detail, but the opinions are polarized and somewhat dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH42 reviews
MATH5C2 reviews
MATH31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1