AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Misako Van Der Poel

CS23 · MATH4 · MATH2 · MATH152 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable self-teaching, attending consistently, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkHard to FollowCaring but InconsistentTest Heavy
  • Many students describe , unanswered questions, and communication issues.
  • Grades feel costly because , and .
  • A smaller , and offers .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students describe tough grading, lots of , and as the main help.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The content is often made harder by confusing , and tests that feel unlike practice work.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

30/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts grades and access to handouts or .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because they describe unclear teaching, , and heavy workload.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Reviews are split, but the dominant pattern , and weak question handling.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students frequently mention tests, pop quizzes, finals, and passing tests as central to the grade, though .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is entirely in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear teaching, heavy work, strict tests, and and .

Main concern

Students often felt they had to self-teach while and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH4
“Her lectures for CS23 were easy to understand, and she gives lots of examples.”
CS23
“She gives plenty of opportunity for .”
MATH152

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe frequent and sometimes unfair tests, but some students mention cheat sheets, notecards, and multiple-choice exams.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesCheat Sheets AllowedMultiple Choice ExamsNotecard Allowed

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes, with some student-friendly supports like cheat sheets or notecards.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesCheat Sheets AllowedMultiple Choice ExamsNotecard Allowed
“ was unfair.”
CS23
“ sheets.”
CS23
“allows you to use a .”
MATH2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and don't look back.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Her lectures are disorganized, , and she didnt seem like she was very knowledgeable on the material.”

⚖️

20/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Huge amount of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't really teach, just asks a question and has the same few students answer it.
  • hard to understand, her teaching style is less explaining and more writing the answer on the board and assuming the class understands.
  • Her lectures for CS23 were easy to understand, and she gives lots of examples.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You wont pass the class unless you pass all the tests.
  • Tons of .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She really cares and wants everyone to pass the class.
  • GO TO HER OFFICE HOURS
  • She gave handouts that and helped me keep track of hw

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 18 detailed in-person reviews across several years with , and teaching clarity.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH28 reviews
CS237 reviews
21 review
MATH1521 review
MATH41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1