AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Charlotte Reyes

PSYC1 · PSYCH12 · SURE23 · PSY1 · PSYCH1 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
8.33%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take Charlotte Reyes only if you can manage a and are willing and posted materials.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasFrequent tangentsLate or canceled classExtra credit availablePassionate but inconsistent
  • Students repeatedly describe the class as , and poorly managed, especially in newer reviews.
  • Older reviews often praise , and approachable content.
  • Getting a good grade can be manageable, but students , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A , and self-management, but the course is not effortless because organization is a major obstacle.

Most , while online evidence is too limited and mixed to prove the A path.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The psychology content is introductory and textbook-based, but unclear lectures and itself.

and , while online reviews give too little detail about content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Attendance does not appear consistently strict, but class cancellations, lateness, and .

In-person reviews mention limited attendance checks and canceled classes, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most recent detailed reviews warn against taking her because of , and weak communication.

Online evidence is split between one very negative and one positive review, while and strongly mixed with recent negative patterns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

67/100

Students mention , lenient grading, and attainable A grades, though tests can still be challenging.

Format shift

, while online reviews do not clearly establish grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not described as massive, but readings, Canvas confusion, practice tests, and .

Format shift

, and confusing assignments, while online comments focus more on access and feedback.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her passion and humor are real strengths, but repeated complaints about tangents, lateness, cancellations, and disorganization dominate the experience.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is sparse and split, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears to combine tests, , and , with tests carrying noticeable weight.

Format shift

In-person , and , while online reviews do not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

who enjoy her passion and students who find the class scattered, late, and confusing.

Main concern

, and inconsistent class meetings are the main risks.

What students said

“ and you'll be confused about assignments.”
PSYCH1
“She cancels class without notice and is often late.”
PSYCH1
“She tries to makes the class entertaining, and it works.”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split, with one student praising the lectures and another saying she was absent and unresponsive.

Main concern

Email response, Canvas access, and .

What students said

“Never answered emails or phone calls.”
PSYCH1
“ a lot!”
PSYCH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but also practice-test support and one open-book final mentioned.

Tough TestsPractice Tests HelpfulOpen Book FinalQuiz-Based Final Material

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

reuse, and one open-book final, so the exam style appears mixed rather than uniformly strict.

Tough TestsPractice Tests HelpfulOpen Book FinalQuiz-Based Final Material
“The text.”
PSYCH1
“ though.”
PSYCH1
“The it was easy.”
PSYCH1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Charlotte is a , but this has to be said. She is incredibly disorganized, her , and when she lectures, it is barely informational.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Consistency

42/100

“She is incredibly disorganized, her , and when she lectures, it is barely informational.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

35/100

“If ”

📈 Grade Path

70/100

“Know the textbook chapter and do the studyguides and you will get an A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She always talks about her own personal life.
  • in the book
  • She was awesome! Very knowledgable and helpful and had very interesting lectures.

Theme 2

🧭 About Organization

  • and she has no clue how to use it.
  • She cancels class without notice and is often late.
  • and unhelpful.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • She's a .
  • Her tests are tough if you don't do the book.
  • there are tons of opportunities.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 35 reviews across many years, with strong recurring themes , and exams.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

PSYCH128 reviews
PSYC13 reviews
PSY12 reviews
PSYCH121 review
SURE231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1