AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

David Lofte

MATH152 · MATH4 · MATH12 · MATH3 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you will attend and keep up, but if and strong test preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and fairLenient gradingAttendance mattersMixed lecture clarityHard tests in some sections
  • Most positive reviews describe Lofte as caring, fair, and willing to help.
  • Grades can be forgiving when students attend, keep up with homework, and use late-work flexibility.
  • Older in-person MATH3 reviews report weak explanations, poor preparation, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

An A is realistic with attendance and , but some sections require major effort and .

Online evidence is limited to one positive review, while and difficult tests.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content ranges from manageable with effort to very .

Online evidence does not describe content difficulty in detail, while and very hard material.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Attendance appears important for passing, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews stress showing up, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and caring support, but serious organization and clarity issues create risk.

The online review is fully positive, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report fair grading, late-work flexibility, and a consistent.

Format shift

Online evidence includes through tags, while in-person reviews give stronger evidence of .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and some students describe heavy study demands, especially in harder sections.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is thin, while study time.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

He is often described as caring and helpful, but some students say and unclear.

Format shift

but limited, while and mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention homework, homework quizzes, study guides, and and exams.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

fairness and help but serious complaints about lecture clarity and test preparation.

Main concern

Some students found lectures disorganized and .

What students said

“If you show up, act like you want to be there and put in the effort you will get an easy A.”
MATH12
“The and I feel like he doesn't prepare you enough for them.”
MATH3

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review is positive and emphasizes that he cares about students passing.

Main concern

.

What students said

“A students to pass.”
MATH152

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because some reviews mention study supports while and poor preparation.

Homework QuizzesHard TestsStudy Guides

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and very hard tests but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Homework QuizzesHard TestsStudy Guides
“ was not a fan of.”
MATH3
“The and I feel like he doesn't prepare you enough for them.”
MATH3
“Study guides and notecards”
MATH4

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up, act like you want to be there and put in the effort you will get an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“David clearly cares about the success of his students, he is great with .”

👍 Recommendation Level

70/100

“Super happy I took this course with him!”

⚖️

72/100

“He doesn't grade harshly at all and allows late work in as long as you do it!”

🧪

48/100

“The and I feel like he doesn't prepare you enough for them.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • David clearly cares about the success of his students, he is great with .
  • He's also very much willing to help you if you need it.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If you show up, act like you want to be there and put in the effort you will get an easy A.
  • He doesn't grade harshly at all and allows late work in as long as you do it!
  • I spent more than 8 hours a day studying for this class and got a B.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization and Exams

  • Only con is organization of due dates.
  • The and I feel like he doesn't prepare you enough for them.
  • Beware. Writes small, consistantly makes errors, not prepared for lectures and sends the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across several years give useful but limited evidence, with one online review and mixed in-person experiences.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH32 reviews
MATH121 review
MATH1521 review
MATH41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values