AI Rate Professor

History

Yolanda Venegas

ENGL100 · ENG2 · HIST17A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Choose Yolanda Venegas only if you can tolerate disorganization and are comfortable learning independently while and revision opportunities.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHelpful feedbackRevision chancesLong readingsWeak lectures
  • Reviews are sharply split, with two recent English reviews praising support and feedback while older history reviews are strongly negative.
  • Positive comments mention extra time, revisions, and help with grades.
  • Negative comments repeatedly , and poor learning value.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

Revision chances and extra time can help grades, but , and disorganization add real effort.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course experience can feel difficult because students report , and .

Only in-person reviews are available, with negative comments focused on course management and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a .

in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Recommendation depends heavily on course context because disorganization and poor learning.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with newer English reviews more positive than older history reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Positive reviews mention extra time, revisions, and help earning a better grade, though negative reviews describe difficult assignments.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload concerns include , and changing assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students praise her support, but the dominant negative evidence points to disorganization, weak lectures, and low learning value.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize readings, essays, assignments, revisions, and the .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

English courses, but major concerns about disorganization and weak lectures, especially in older history reviews.

Main concern

The and unclear course management.

What students said

“ and also gives .”
ENGL100
“first week of class she already messes everyone up by not ”
ENG2
“The .”
HIST17A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention studying for a final but do not clearly prove .

Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the .

Final Mentioned
“When studding for the and learned more from her in 30 minutes than I did all semester!”
HIST17A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“The .”

⚖️

68/100

“If you get a grade you don't want, she lets you revise it for a better grade.”

📚 Workload Risk

30/100

“ too long”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are unexciting.
  • The only thing I learned was how to hate history even more than I did before.
  • She loves interacting with the class and talking to you 1 on 1.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Assignments

  • and as long as you work with her and try she'll do her best to make sure you get a good grade!
  • She lets you revise it for a better grade.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • first week of class she already messes everyone up by not
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only six reviews, several are old, and opinions differ sharply between English and history courses.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

HIST17A3 reviews
ENG22 reviews
ENGL1001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values