AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sasha Kiselstein

MATH4 · MATH152 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you can keep up with daily work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsDaily homeworkParticipation gradedAccessible outside classMixed enthusiasm
  • Students agree expectations and .
  • Workload and because and participation is graded.
  • Teaching quality is mixed, ranging from mediocre and and helpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but and participation mean the grade requires steady effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material does not sound extreme, but the and participation.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation is graded and one review warns that skipping class can make passing unlikely.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because students value her clarity and accessibility but criticize low enthusiasm and workload.

Both .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and just, with but no strong evidence of easy grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

and graded participation make the workload heavier than the average class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and accessible, but one review calls her mediocre and unenthusiastic.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and expectations, but also daily homework, participation grading, and mixed teaching energy.

Main concern

and attendance-linked participation can make the class feel demanding.

What students said

“ .”
MATH4
“What you put into the class you will get out.”
MATH152
“She doesn't have much enthusiasm while teaching.”
MATH4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the open-book or closed-book.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“What you put into the class you will get out.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Sasha was a good teacher.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“ .”

⚖️

55/100

“ and just.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She doesn't have much enthusiasm while teaching.
  • she goes out of .

Theme 2

📈 About Work & Grades

  • .
  • Participation is graded as well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict on teaching quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1521 review
MATH41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values