AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · English

Jill Logan

ENGLISH1A · ENGL91610 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take Jill Logan if you want structured online writing support, but expect .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlySupportive Writing CoachOrganized Online CourseHelpful FeedbackMixed Grading Experience
  • Most students describe a .
  • Workload is usually light and focused on essays, but procrastination can still hurt performance.
  • One older and limited online instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Getting a good grade looks manageable if students keep up with the writing work, but one review warns that .

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is described as basic and step-by-step, though the writing expectations still require steady effort.

All course difficulty evidence comes from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly state an .

Only online reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and organization, but one review reports a poor online learning experience.

All recommendation evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Feedback and criteria are praised, but one review directly calls her a .

Format shift

, and there are no in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students mention light assigned work, light reading, and .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Positive reviews describe her as , and helpful, while one review says the online class lacked instruction.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is mixed but mostly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

and writing process work rather than exams as the main assessment style.

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly positive about support, organization, light work, and writing guidance, with one and limited instruction.

Main concern

A and weak lecture support in the online format.

What students said

“I felt supported the whole way through.”
ENGLISH1A
“The assigned work is light.”
ENGL91610
“Very harsh grader given there was , presentations, links to places of lecture and unless asked for.”
2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essays and writing assignments, but they do .

Two Essays MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention essays, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Two Essays MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy
“ .”
ENGL91610

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I felt supported the whole way through.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Really great teacher.”

📝 Workload

78/100

“The assigned work is light.”

⚖️

50/100

“Very harsh grader given there was , presentations, links to places of lecture and unless asked for.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • I like Jill as a teacher a lot because of , and .
  • Really great teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • The assigned work is light.
  • as well.
  • .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • Very harsh grader given there was , presentations, links to places of lecture and unless asked for.
  • If you do the work; you'll be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three online reviews across several years give useful but limited evidence, with mostly consistent positives and one major negative outlier.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

21 review
ENGL916101 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values