AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Scott Phelps

CJ3 · CJ · CJ110 · CJ6 · CRIMBEHAVIOR · CRIMINALJUSTIC · CJ2CJ6 · CRIMINALLAW · CJ20 · CJCJ · CJ2 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want an engaging, experience-driven criminal justice class with and note-based exams.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging Field StoriesHelpful And CaringEasy GradingClear LecturesOccasionally Disorganized
  • Students repeatedly praise his real-world criminal justice experience and memorable stories.
  • The course is usually easy if , and do the reading.
  • A small minority found his lectures repetitive, boring, or disorganized.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears easy with , and basic test preparation rather than heavy outside work.

All authoritative review evidence is in person because the online review count is zero.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The because lectures use stories and , though some students need steady attention and notes.

Only in-person evidence is counted, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as harshly policed, but notes and lecture content are important for passing tests.

In-person comments stress attending and taking notes; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him for , and interesting lectures.

Recommendation evidence comes only from in-person reviews under the authoritative format counts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

85/100

Students , and even a dropped test in one class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Workload appears light, with , and a few exams rather than frequent projects.

Format shift

and manageable preparation; online evidence is absent.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students call him funny, helpful, experienced, and engaging, despite a few complaints about boredom and organization.

Format shift

The teaching pattern .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and some notebook work rather than major projects.

Format shift

and finals repeatedly; online assessment evidence is not counted.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, , and generally easy grading.

Main concern

Some students say lectures can become repetitive or disorganized.

What students said

“He tells a lot of stories and they are applicable and keep you interested.”
CJ20
“You have to do barely any work to get a good grade in the class.”
CRIMINALJUSTIC
“ so much he even looses track of what he is saying”
CJ20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams seem straightforward and lecture-based, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book policies.

Lecture-Based TestsStraightforward Midterm And FinalOne Dropped TestNotebook Required

Assessment risk

Standard

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe lecture-based tests, a and final, and one class where one of three tests is dropped.

Lecture-Based TestsStraightforward Midterm And FinalOne Dropped TestNotebook Required
“for .”
CJ20
“ and and you never get unexpected surprises.”
CJ20
“ and he throws one out.”
CRIMINALLAW

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . No one cares more about his students than Scott Phelps.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Super fun teacher! He lays out the concepts clearly and makes sure that u get what he is saying.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

92/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Value

86/100

“You have to do barely any work to get a good grade in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's got some really cool stories.
  • .
  • He lays out the concepts clearly and makes sure that u get what he is saying.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class is easy if you do the reading.
  • and and you never get unexpected surprises.
  • and he throws one out.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • He talks way too so much he even looses track of what he is saying
  • This teach is extremely boring.
  • he may have subject experience but teaching experience is lacking.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 21 reviews with consistent themes, but most are old and only one grade is reported.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CJ208 reviews
CJ2 reviews
CJ22 reviews
CJ62 reviews
CJ1101 review
Show 6 more courses
CJ2CJ61 review
CJ31 review
CJCJ1 review
CRIMBEHAVIOR1 review
CRIMINALJUSTIC1 review
CRIMINALLAW1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values