AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Art

Jeanne Brubaker

ART4 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Consider another instructor if you want more studio time, concise lectures, and a smoother art class structure.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice but inefficientLong lecturesClear expectationsPointless projectsLimited studio time
  • Students agree she is nice and willing to help, but the classroom experience is inefficient.
  • Long lectures and interruptions reduce time for actual art work.
  • A good grade is possible, but several students disliked the assignments and structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but students report time-consuming and and portfolio work.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The art content does not sound conceptually hard, but the class structure makes the experience more frustrating than easy.

, and they describe manageable content with inefficient delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but the class depends heavily on in-person lectures and studio time.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Recommendation is low because students complain about long lectures, lost work time, and poor course structure.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades range from A to B, and reviews mention clear expectations but .

Format shift

and expectations.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload includes projects plus a writing-heavy portfolio, which students found inefficient rather than extremely hard.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is helpful and nice, but long tangents and interruptions weaken the teaching experience.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize projects, portfolios, writing, sketches, collage, pastel, and painting rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and helpful instructor whose long lectures and odd assignments frustrate students.

Main concern

The main concern is lost studio time from long lectures and required listening periods.

What students said

“Her lectures were solid but often went off on unnecessary tangents and lasted WAY longer than they needed to.”
ART4
“ .”
ART4
“Helpful and .”
ART4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the exam format or policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“She didn't tell us the day of the .”
ART4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Very nice and willing to help.”

⚠️ Class Structure

28/100

“Her lectures are long winded, and she stops you from working while she presents.”

📁 Assignment Fit

48/100

“The end-of-the semester portfolio thing was weird and required lots of writing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very nice and willing to help.
  • Helpful and .
  • Her lectures are long winded, and she stops you from working while she presents.

Theme 2

🎨 About Studio Time

  • Her lectures were solid but often went off on unnecessary tangents and lasted WAY longer than they needed to.
  • which cut into our given class time to work because she insists that you stop what you're doing to listen.
  • A fun class but I would have liked more drawing.

Theme 3

📁 About Projects

  • .
  • The end-of-the semester portfolio thing was weird and required lots of writing.
  • Involves pastel, collage and painting; barely any drawing other than the sketches you'll paint over.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews are available, all from the same course and semester, so confidence is limited.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART43 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values