AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dan Morgali

MATH154 · MATH13 · MATH5B · MATH12STATS · MATH4 · STATS12 · MATH5A · MATH · SATTISTICS · MATHPREC · STAT12 · MATH5766 · MAH2 · STATISTICS · MATH152 · MATH2 · MATH12 · 5C · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are comfortable learning independently and can handle inconsistency in pacing and organization.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful but inconsistentOften absentRushed explanationsFair partial creditLots of homework
  • many students find him kind and clear, while and unreliable.
  • A recurring concern is missed classes, slow grading, and .
  • Grades can be fair because of partial credit, but and self-study.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Partial credit and , but , and self-study keep the A from being easy.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content is manageable for some students but , and hard without independent study.

, so no format comparison can be made.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Students do not report strict attendance rules, but his own frequent absences disrupt pacing and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

He is worth considering for independent math students, but many reviews warn against him because of disorganization and missed classes.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students often mention fair grading and partial credit, but and delayed returns reduce the benefit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

, and extra self-study when lectures move too fast.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

His teaching is inconsistent, with praise for clarity and kindness balanced by repeated complaints about rushing, absences, and poor organization.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals, with exams important but not the only assessment type.

Format shift

Assessment evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

praise for his patience and fairness but repeated complaints about absences, disorganization, rushed lectures, and delayed grading.

Main concern

Students who need structure may struggle with , and .

What students said

“Morgali is really difficult to learn from! He moves through material SO fast!”
MATH12
“He is a nice person, but he misses a lot of classes without notifying anyone...”
MATH5B
“ if you answered wrong.”
STATS12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

straightforward tests mentioned and some student-friendly partial credit or note-card support.

Hard TestsPartial CreditStraightforward Exams in Some ClassesComprehensive Final MentionedNote Card Allowed in One Stats Class

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

comprehensive final, and one note card allowed, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Hard TestsPartial CreditComprehensive Final MentionedNote Card Allowed in One Stats Class
“ and no cheat sheets or rework allowed. .”
MATH4
“ and you get to use a card of .”
MATH12STATS
“ if you answered wrong.”
STATS12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dan is a great guy. He's also incredibly unorganized and anything back to study from / even know how you're doing in the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, reliability, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“His teaching is often rushed and unclear and he doesn't show up to his own classes often.”

⚖️

62/100

“ if you answered wrong.”

📚 Workload Pressure

36/100

“gotta keep up with him because theirs a lot of homework.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He jumps from one example to another way too fast.
  • He speeds through examples w/out giving time to comprehend.
  • He teaches with examples and goes over everything slowly.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Reliability

  • He's well known for missing class. Missed 11 days in my term!
  • Does miss class a lot.
  • he is absent a lot, doesn't return work, and is NEVER at his office hours!
  • He doesn't send emails on the many days he missed

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • He does though which really helps.
  • in class work.
  • Do and turn in and try to keep up for quizzes.
  • and you get to use a card of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six reviews over many years provide a rich and consistent pattern of both strengths and recurring risks.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 510
3 out of 59
2 out of 58
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH15210 reviews
MATH126 reviews
MATH44 reviews
MATH5B4 reviews
MATH5A3 reviews
Show 15 more courses
STATS123 reviews
MATH1542 reviews
STATISTICS2 reviews
121 review
1541 review
5C1 review
MAH21 review
MATH1 review
MATH12STATS1 review
MATH131 review
MATH21 review
MATH57661 review
MATHPREC1 review
SATTISTICS1 review
STAT121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1