AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Timothy Frank

N24 · PHARM · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can teach yourself and handle strict skill evaluation.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSoft-Spoken LecturesNitpicky Skills GradingSelf-Study HeavyDifficult Material
  • Students describe weak lecture delivery and say he is hard to hear.
  • as nitpicky and hard to challenge.
  • Pharmacology can be passable, but students say .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Passing may be possible, but an A looks costly because students mention , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The subject is described as difficult and dry, and later lectures become hard material even when passing can be manageable.

All course and pharmacology reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Students mainly warn about unclear lectures, quiet delivery, and strict or .

Recommendation and is mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

as nitpicky, and one student says his interpretation may not match what happened.

Format shift

, and the clearest grading evidence is negative.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students do not describe many assignments, but they do describe needing to study very hard and learn independently.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students repeatedly describe quiet, noninteractive, hard-to-understand lectures despite acknowledging his intelligence.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention lab skills and course study demands but do not clearly define the assessment breakdown.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a quiet instructor whose lectures are and .

Main concern

because lectures are hard to hear or understand.

What students said

“he will nit pick on everything!”
N24
“You won't learn from lecture you're on your own and study very hard.”
N24

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring rules.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You won't learn from lecture you're on your own and study very hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“his lectures are not interactive.”

⚖️

20/100

“he will nit pick on everything!”

📚

35/100

“You won't learn from lecture you're on your own and study very hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he speaks very low and his lectures are not interactive.
  • Don't tape his lectures you won't hear or understand what he's saying most of the time.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • he will nit pick on everything!
  • his interpretation of what happened is not the reality.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, but their concerns about lecture clarity are fairly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N242 reviews
PHARM1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values