AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Cheryl Furbee

ACCT6 · ACCT · ACCT1B · ACCT151A · ACCTA · ACCOUNTINGOL · ACCT1A · ACCT163 · ACCT151 · INTROTOBUS · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can handle lots of self-directed work for a fair chance at a good grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful When ReachedHeavy HomeworkMixed Teaching ClarityEasy GradingOnline-Heavy Experience
  • Students often praise her kindness, responsiveness, and useful materials.
  • Workload is consistently described as heavy, especially in online-style accounting courses.
  • , but learning quality and organization vary sharply.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic because grading and retries can be forgiving, but and self-teaching.

Online evidence mentions , while in but heavier confusion and busywork.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Accounting content and workload are .

The one Online review calls the work expected for accounting, while in person comments range .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

, though one student says you do not have to go.

Only in , and Online evidence does not address it.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and industry relevance, but many warn about organization and self-teaching.

The Online review is positive, while in person reviews are sharply split between excellent and avoid.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Multiple students report easy grading, retries, , and good grades despite errors.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions three test tries, while in person evidence and A outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and publisher materials are repeatedly described as a lot or overwhelming.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Average

66/100

She is often described as kind and helpful, but several students call the .

Format shift

Online evidence is positive but limited, while in person evidence is broad and highly mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessments appear to , and chapter tests.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions weekly tests, while in , and chapter tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person evidence is mixed, with strong praise for help and relevance but repeated complaints about disorganization, busywork, and self-teaching.

Main concern

Students may need .

What students said

“Teach yourself !!! She will lower your gpa”
ACCT151
“Answers questions SUPER FAST.”
ACCT1A
“ though, I get A's from her yet I don't really learn anything.”
ACCT151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only Online review is positive, with , and lots of homework.

Main concern

There is a lot of .

What students said

“There is a lot of , but it it to be expected from an accounting class.”
ACCT1B
“weekly test, but she gives you three tries and the highest score gets graded.”
ACCT1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe recurring tests and multiple attempts, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policies.

Weekly TestsMultiple AttemptsChapter TestsExtra Credit Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In , and hard tests, but does not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Chapter TestsMultiple AttemptsHard Tests
“Chapter tests are mc, best score of 2.”
ACCT1B
“ ”
INTROTOBUS

Online

The and highest score counted, but does not prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Weekly TestsThree AttemptsHighest Score Counts
“There are weekly test, but she gives you three tries and the highest score gets graded.”
ACCT1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ though, I get A's from her yet I don't really learn anything.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“She makes accounting fun and is a superb lecturer.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“She gives a ton of work each week and it can seem overwhelming at times”

⚖️

76/100

“if you just submit lots of material, even if it is all wrong she will give you an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She constantly makes mistakes then goes back doing nothing but .
  • She makes accounting fun and is a superb lecturer.
  • Written instructions are confusing and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of , but it it to be expected from an accounting class.
  • though, I get A's from her yet I don't really learn anything.
  • Good teacher, hard but you learn a lot.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • A wonderful, kind and helpful instructor.
  • Answers questions SUPER FAST.
  • She is a , but the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The profile has 21 reviews over many years with detailed but mixed comments, though many are old.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT151A6 reviews
ACCT1B4 reviews
ACCT1513 reviews
ACCT1632 reviews
ACCOUNTINGOL1 review
Show 5 more courses
ACCT1 review
ACCT1A1 review
ACCT61 review
ACCTA1 review
INTROTOBUS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values