AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Peggy Gnehm

N14 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you can handle a demanding nursing course with and uneven clarity.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery high standardsHard testsUnclear explanationsMixed approachabilityHarsh essay grading
  • Reviews agree that Peggy Gnehm is difficult and holds very high standards.
  • Teaching clarity is mixed, with one student saying she checks understanding and another calling her .
  • Tests and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

20/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because reviews cite very , and reluctance to give high essay scores.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels challenging because and tests are described as very hard.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is weak because the , and harsh grading despite one partly positive lecture review.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Grading appears harsh because one and does not like to give high scores.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload pressure appears high because the course has very high standards and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is weak overall because comments split between helpful checking for understanding and , and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Assessment evidence leans toward tests and as the main concern.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a high-standard instructor whose lectures may help some students but and harsh to others.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Very high standards.”
N14
“ ”
N14
“Unhelpful, unapproachable, difficult to follow and understand.”
N14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , but they do describe the tests as very hard.

Super hard tests

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy, but they .

Super hard tests
“ ”
N14

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unhelpful, unapproachable, difficult to follow and understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ , but always checks to make sure you understand her.”

📈 Difficulty Level

20/100

“ ”

⚖️

15/100

“ and doesn't like to give high scores”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but always checks to make sure you understand her.
  • Unhelpful, unapproachable, difficult to follow and understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very high standards.
  • Really difficult teacher.

Theme 3

🧠 About Lectures

  • Fun lectures.
  • Sometimes seems off topic
  • Has strange sense of humor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 2 reviews are available, though and demanding standards.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

N142 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values