AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jim Funaro

ANTH1 · ANTHROPOLOGY2 · ANTHRO8 · ANTHROOFRELIG · ANTHRO2 · ANTHRO1L86779 · ANTHOR2 · ANTRO5667 · ANTHR1 · ANTHR2 · ANTHRSECT · CULTURALANTHRO · ANTHO1L · PHYSICALANTHRO · ANTHR182474 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning independently from scattered lectures and difficult exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized tangentsHard examsPoor communicationPolarizing lecturerHarsh grading
  • Reviews are highly polarized, but negative comments dominate and often warn students away.
  • Students repeatedly complain about tangents, weak direction, poor communication, and lectures that miss test material.
  • Exams and did not translate into strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students say a B or A is possible with effort, but , and disappointing grades despite doing the work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, but lectures often wander away from tested material and make the course harder to manage.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because students rely heavily on lecture notes for tests, though no strict mandatory policy is clearly proven.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Many students because of disorganized lectures, poor communication, and difficult exams.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Several students and gives low grades despite completed work and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Workload varies, but , and difficult exams make the course feel heavy for many students.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A minority praise his knowledge and passion, but many describe rambling lectures, tangents, and weak communication.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Reviews repeatedly center on , and homework as .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a polarizing instructor whose passion sometimes lands well but whose tangents, hard exams, and .

Main concern

Poor structure and .

What students said

“The and long!”
ANTHRO1L86779
“He gives you no direction!”
ANTHR1
“my advice is run away as fast as you can.”
ANTHROPOLOGY2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as long, confusing, and difficult, but reviews .

Extremely Difficult ExamsLong ExamsMidterm and FinalTrue/False and Multiple Choice

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult and long exams, including a midterm and final, but .

Extremely Difficult ExamsLong ExamsMidterm and FinalTrue/False and Multiple Choice
“The and long!”
ANTHRO1L86779
“Midterm and Final were 100 question true/false & multiple choice questions designed to confuse.”
ANTHROPOLOGY2
“The because he devotes most of his lecture time to these "acid-trip" theories and not to the materiel on which he is testing.”
ANTHR1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , if you're in . It's literally the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He gives you no direction!”

📘

25/100

“The and long!”

⚖️

20/100

“I did all the work, was there (almost) every day, sat in the front, did , and he gave me a C.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He went off on tangents A LOT.
  • His lectures are disjointed ramblings, delivered while relentlessly pacing.
  • Although he is overconfident and sometimes harsh, Mr Funaro is a fantastic teacher.
  • Great lecturer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The and long!
  • I did all the assignments and he have me a C.
  • Be prepared to work... you can get an A if you follow his instructions, review notes, do the assignments.
  • A little effort will score you a B

Theme 3

🚩 About Recommendation

  • .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years provide rich, consistent evidence of polarizing teaching and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ANTHR14 reviews
ANTHRO23 reviews
ANTH12 reviews
ANTHR22 reviews
ANTHO1L1 review
Show 10 more courses
ANTHOR21 review
ANTHR1824741 review
ANTHRO1L867791 review
ANTHRO81 review
ANTHROOFRELIG1 review
ANTHROPOLOGY21 review
ANTHRSECT1 review
ANTRO56671 review
CULTURALANTHRO1 review
PHYSICALANTHRO1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values