AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Computer Science

Sue Nerton

CS23 · CS12J · CSJAV7657 · CS2 · CS1L · CIS23 · MATH23CS23 · CIS11 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can keep up independently and ask questions early, because the support experience is uneven.

Best fit · Effort For RewardScattered LecturesHelpful One on OneDemanding WorkMixed ClarityFair Points
  • Students describe Sue Nerton as smart and often kind, but lecture clarity is highly inconsistent.
  • Success depends on staying current with homework and asking for help before falling behind.
  • Older reviews praise her support, while later reviews criticize vague answers and impatience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

An A looks possible with and participation, but the course is not easy and falling behind becomes costly.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online reviews to compare.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Programming and discrete math content are repeatedly described as tough, fast, or .

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews are available, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

57/100

Students recommend her when they value demanding but fair teaching, but several warn against taking her because of and weak answers.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grading is described as mostly fair with and , but one review says partial credit was not given.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students repeatedly say to stay on top of , and difficult material, so the workload is manageable but not light.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Her teaching ranges from helpful and engaging to scattered, vague, and .

Format shift

, and they show strongly mixed teaching experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews mostly discuss homework, programs, participation, , and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence comes from in-person classes, where students report demanding programming content with mixed teaching clarity and some strong one-on-one help.

Main concern

Lectures can be scattered, and students who fall behind .

What students said

“Sue is the .”
CSJAV7657
“Great programming teacher. Will bend over backwards to make sure you pass her class.”
CS12J
“Yes, it is tough, but she trys to give the students alot of and those who are willing to work hard should do well.”
CIS23

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring policy, or open-book status.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great programming teacher. Will bend over backwards to make sure you pass her class. Not hard if you do the homework and study!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Upbeat, and impossible to follow. She jumps around in her lectures so much she gets lost.”

⚖️

58/100

“Sue is a demanding teacher but grades for the most part fairly.”

📈 Effort Required

56/100

“Just stay on top of the work and you're ok.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She taught a lot, but would never answer any questions.
  • She jumps around in her lectures so much she gets lost.
  • I come away from her lectures not being stressed out and having a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is not easy though, by any means.
  • those who are willing to work hard should do well.
  • Not hard if you do the homework and study!

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • Very personable and .
  • and will assist you in any way possible.
  • If you do not get her lectures which are a little scattered, .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

, but the evidence is old and opinions are inconsistent.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CS234 reviews
CIS113 reviews
CS12J3 reviews
CS22 reviews
CIS231 review
Show 3 more courses
CS1L1 review
CSJAV76571 review
MATH23CS231 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values