AI Rate Professor

Business

Patricia Stokee

AAAA · BUS7586249BU · BUS20 · BUS163 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid Patricia Stokee unless you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear InstructionsWeak Course StructurePoor Practical ExamplesMixed Teaching ReviewsNot Recommended
  • , and poor connection between lectures and assignments.
  • One student found her professional and clear, but the negative comments are stronger and more frequent.
  • The course does not sound extremely difficult, but poor teaching makes the experience frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The class does not sound brutally hard, but predictable.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content may be moderate, but and weak practical examples make it harder to learn.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person business reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because they found the and poorly connected to assignments.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

There and moderate difficulty ratings.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews focus more on poor instruction than heavy workload, so the workload appears moderate but frustrating.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Three of , and lack of practical knowledge.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention class lectures and an end-of-semester presentation but do not clearly show an .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

instruction, weak practical knowledge, and disconnected assignments.

Main concern

Students may need to compensate for and poor course organization.

What students said

“She does not give good instructions nor does she seem to have a .”
BUS7586249BU
“Everything we learned in class was pointless.”
BUS20
“It feels like she has no practical knowledge about the subject”
AAAA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or test difficulty.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does not give good instructions nor does she seem to have a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality and course structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She does not give good instructions nor does she seem to have a .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“I did not enjoy this class what so ever and would suggest my friends to say away from her.”

📘 Course Structure

30/100

“I felt there wasn't any relationship with the class lectures and what she was asking of us.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a professional teacher who cares for her students.
  • and to the point.
  • She does not give good instructions nor does she seem to have a .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Course Problems

  • Everything we learned in class was pointless.
  • It feels like she has no practical knowledge about the subject
  • I felt there wasn't any relationship with the class lectures and what she was asking of us.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but the negative teaching concerns are specific and mostly consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AAAA1 review
BUS1631 review
BUS201 review
BUS7586249BU1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values