AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Kenison

MATH154 · MATH152 · MATH12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and and persistence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing TeacherHard To UnderstandSerious Math FocusHelpful For SomeHigh Stress
  • Reviews are strongly split, but negative comments outweigh positive ones.
  • Several students say , and makes math harder to understand.
  • Students who are serious, independent, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Doing well seems possible with homework and math seriousness, but students also report stress, confusion, and failing outcomes.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course feels harder for many students because as unclear.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most comments discourage taking him because students found him hard to understand and not helpful enough.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and mixed grades, but do not clearly show unusually harsh or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework and weekly quizzes are mentioned, but workload complaints focus more on stress and clarity than volume.

Format shift

Workload evidence is only in-person.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

A few students praise his help, but , and difficult to learn from.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention exams, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is entirely in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with two positive comments but several severe complaints about clarity and support.

Main concern

The and limited help for struggling students.

What students said

“He was very hard to understand”
MATH12
“ .”
MATH152
“Ask away, he always has time to help you understand the material.”
MATH154

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and weekly quizzes, but .

Multiple ExamsWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam format or book policy.

Multiple ExamsWeekly Quizzes
“the first exam, which was the easiest of 4”
MATH12
“He gives weekly quizes which only have 3 questions on them.”
MATH154

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“WARNING! IF YOU PLAN ON LEARNING AND !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ !”

📈 Difficulty & Effort

42/100

“this class is definitely not for those that want get by.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher, went through steps very slowly.
  • He was very hard to understand
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this class is definitely not for those that want get by.
  • If you do all your hw with !
  • Math is already difficult enough but he made it more difficult to understand.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • If you plan to have a .
  • Class started with 30+ students and ended with less than 15!
  • it was a waste of my semester!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews are available, but and recent enough comments with consistent concern about clarity.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1523 reviews
MATH121 review
MATH1541 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values