AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Elizabeth McDade-Montez

PSYCH1 · PSYCH181572 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Consider her only if you can keep up with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-Paced LecturesExam-Heavy ClassTextbook RelianceMixed ClarityHelpful Personality
  • and helpful, while the other says she teaches too fast.
  • One review says the class and a .
  • Students may do well if they can learn from the textbook and handle fast lecture pacing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A and , but the and fast pacing require real study effort.

All grade and effort evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content appears manageable for some students but challenging when lectures move quickly and slides lack guidance.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict on whether the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on whether a student can handle fast lectures, textbook reliance, and .

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with one positive and one negative experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One reported A suggests success is possible, but the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, with .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not described as assignment-heavy, but the class depends heavily on studying for three exams and a final.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

clarity and another criticizing fast pacing and weak slides.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they provide conflicting teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

One review states the class is based on three exams and a .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, and the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and helpful instruction and fast, .

Main concern

The main risk is fast lecture pacing and and textbook material.

What students said

“She goes way too fast when she teaches”
PSYCH181572
“ , and friendly.”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam setup appears exam-heavy but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or .

Three ExamsFinal ExamReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence says the class is based on three exams and a final, but .

Three ExamsFinal Exam
“Her class is based off 3 exams and a final.”
PSYCH181572

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She goes way too fast when she teaches, and hardly ever answers what you're actually asking her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and textbook reliance. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , and friendly.”

📝

92/100

“Her class is based off 3 exams and a final.”

📚 Course Difficulty

45/100

“She goes way too fast when she teaches”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Slideshows are useless..
  • She goes way too fast when she teaches
  • , and friendly.

Theme 2

📈

  • Her class is based off 3 exams and a final.
  • Her only flaw is that she relies too heavily on the textbook.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only and they directly conflict on teaching clarity and difficulty.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH11 review
PSYCH1815721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values