AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Anthropology

Michelle Bliesner

ANTH1 · ANTHANTH · ANTHR1 · ANTHR2 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want an interesting anthropology class with , and a supportive instructor.

Best fit · Easy A HunterHelpful and fairVery easy classPassionate lecturerLight workloadStudent-friendly final
  • Students consistently describe Michelle Bliesner as helpful, fair, and passionate.
  • The course is repeatedly described as easy with reasonable work and .
  • but one review explicitly mentions a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Students describe the class as extremely easy with reasonable work, but the limited grade evidence keeps it just below a guaranteed walk-in A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The content appears beginner-friendly because students say the class is easy, interesting, and manageable even with reduced reading.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes anthropology enjoyable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe her as fair and and a strong focus on students passing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

93/100

Students report , and enough preparation with only part of the assigned reading.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently praise her as helpful, knowledgeable, passionate, and fun to learn from.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online comparison available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews mention a take-home final, one presentation, reading, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing easy coursework, fair treatment, and engaging anthropology teaching.

Main concern

A few comments are old and only one gives a reported grade.

What students said

“she was so helpful and fair.”
ANTH1
“ , and fun!”
ANTHR1
“First off, this class was extremely easy.”
ANTHANTH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but other exam rules are not clearly proven.

Take-Home Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

90/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, while other exam details are not clearly proven.

Take-Home Final
“she gave us a ”
ANTH1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“one of . she was so helpful and fair.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Michelle is really passionate about her subject, very knowledgeable, and all around a cool lady.”

📈 Easy Class Value

88/100

“First off, this class was extremely easy.”

📝 Workload and Exams

93/100

“she gave us a and there is .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she cares about her students passing and learning at the same time.
  • She is a great teacher, gives good advise when she grades, and just a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • First off, this class was extremely easy.
  • the work is reasonable.
  • there is .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are consistent and specific, but they are old and include limited grade data.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHR22 reviews
808821 review
ANTH11 review
ANTHANTH1 review
ANTHR11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values