AI Rate Professor

English

Grace Donatelli-Sordo

ENGL255 · ENG100 · ENG1A · ENGLI9919 · ABFAE · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a , but use outside help if your writing needs major improvement.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring TeacherClear InstructionsEasy English ClassBusy WorkMixed Support
  • Most students describe her as , and invested in student success.
  • Several reviews say the class is easy, but one student says she fails many students.
  • Writing support may be uneven, so students who need fundamentals should use tutoring too.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

The class can be easy for engaged students, but the failing-students comment keeps it from being a guaranteed easy A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students describe the English class as easy and focused on basic sentence structure, though some wanted stronger instruction.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and clear, but concerns about busy work and failing students add caution.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

by one warning that she fails many students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload sounds manageable but includes repeated complaints about busy work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most reviews praise her clarity, care, and student focus, despite some complaints about poor teaching habits and limited nuts-and-bolts instruction.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and writing support rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention coursework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and easy coursework with some concerns about busy work and failing students.

Main concern

Students needing detailed writing mechanics may need tutoring beyond class.

What students said

“She wants to see her students succeed not fail.”
ENG100
“by far, a very easy english class.”
ENG1A
“She fails a lot of students.”
ENGL255

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She wants to see her students succeed not fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She is what I call a real teacher.”

📈 Course Easiness

72/100

“by far, a very easy english class.”

⚖️

55/100

“She fails a lot of students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is great she loves her students and teaches very well
  • She enjoys what she does and .
  • Nice and and her students, interesting material

Theme 2

📚 About Workload And Content

  • claims that she does not give out "busy work" but about 90% of and class work is just that.
  • by far, a very easy english class.
  • somedays were spent without doing much, though.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support Gaps

  • Some student felt that she didn't offer enough "nuts and bolts" instruction.
  • If you have a lot of improvements to make in your writing, be sure to visit the tutors
  • Takes no responsibility for her poor teaching habits.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

but mixed evidence, with mostly positive comments and one sharply negative outlier.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
ABFAE1 review
ENG1001 review
ENGL2551 review
ENGLI99191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values