AI Rate Professor

Economics

Sue Holt

ECON · ES10 · ENVIRSCIENCE · ENVIROSTUDIES · STATISTICS · ES5578 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can handle slow PowerPoint lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear PowerPointsHelpful Outside ClassBoring LecturesPassionate About SubjectMixed Organization
  • Students , and helpful, but many say lectures are very boring.
  • Study guides and , yet some students still describe ES10 as hard.
  • Reviews are strongly mixed, with several very high recommendations and several sharp warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Study , but students still report real studying and some hard material.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is not impossible, but students describe ES10 as hard and .

, and they mix clear materials with complaints about hard class content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

, and help, but boredom and organization issues keep the recommendation mixed.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grading sounds fair rather than generous, with study guides helping on tests but .

Format shift

and assessment expectations.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention study guides, heavy note-taking, rereading slides, and , so the workload is moderate.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Holt is often described as knowledgeable, nice, and inspiring, but repeated boredom and .

Format shift

evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention tests, study guides, notes, and , so .

Format shift

Only in-person comments describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and a caring instructor, but lecture boredom and uneven organization are recurring problems.

Main concern

Many students say the lectures are hard to stay awake through.

What students said

“Her portion of the class is the easiest because and detailed”
ES10
“Sue is boring, yet her class is well structured.”
ES10
“ and tests.”
ES10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and study guides, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsStudy GuidesOptional Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study guides, but .

TestsStudy GuidesOptional Papers
“if you do her study guides you will ace her questions on the tests”
ES10
“Just don't write a .”
ES10
“they put questions o nthe test that are neither in the notes or on the study guide”
ES5578

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Extremely nice, yet equally boring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She made everything so clear.”

👍 Recommendation Level

65/100

“ .”

⚖️ Effort And Tests

62/100

“if you do her study guides you will ace her questions on the tests”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Sue is very knowledgeable and very nice.
  • She inspires me.
  • Very intelligent, engaging lecturer, kept me thinking.

Theme 2

😴 About Lecture Pace

  • Sue is boring, yet her class is well structured.
  • Smart but boring, very boring, her classes made me want to sleep
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Exams And Work

  • down in notes during class, must go back and reread.
  • and tests.
  • Her study guides help a lot too.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across many years , and helpfulness, though the data is old.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ES1010 reviews
ECON1 review
ENVIROSTUDIES1 review
ENVIRSCIENCE1 review
ES55781 review
Show 1 more courses
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1