Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
62/100Study , but students still report real studying and some hard material.
because there are no online reviews.
ECON · ES10 · ENVIRSCIENCE · ENVIROSTUDIES · STATISTICS · ES5578 · 15 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Study guides can make her test questions manageable, but students still report real studying and some hard material.
All evidence comes from in-person reviews because there are no online reviews.
Is the course easy?
The content is not impossible, but students describe ES10 as hard and intellectually demanding despite clear slides.
Only in-person reviews are available, and they mix clear materials with complaints about hard class content.
Is attendance flexible?
Reviews do not clearly state whether attendance is optional or mandatory.
Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an attendance policy.
Is this professor recommended?
Students recommend her for clarity, passion, and help, but boredom and organization issues keep the recommendation mixed.
All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
55/100
Grading sounds fair rather than generous, with study guides helping on tests but unclear paper expectations causing concern.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews mention grading and assessment expectations.
Workload
Moderate
45/100
Students mention study guides, heavy note-taking, rereading slides, and optional papers, so the workload is moderate.
Format shift
All workload evidence comes from in-person reviews.
Teaching experience
Good
70/100
Holt is often described as knowledgeable, nice, and inspiring, but repeated boredom and some unclear organization lower the score.
Format shift
Only in-person reviews are available, with no online teaching evidence.
Assessment method
Balanced
60/100
Reviews mention tests, study guides, notes, and optional papers, so assessment is not purely exam-based.
Format shift
Only in-person comments describe assessments.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person reviews show clear materials and a caring instructor, but lecture boredom and uneven organization are recurring problems.
Main concern
Many students say the lectures are hard to stay awake through.
What students said
“Her portion of the class is the easiest because her powerpoints are very clear and detailed”
“Sue is boring, yet her class is well structured.”
“She was unorganized and unclear on what was going to be the tests.”
Remote format
Low confidence
No stored summary is available for this format.
Main concern
No main concern is stored for this format.
Exam style
Reviews mention tests and study guides, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or strict exam policies.
Assessment risk
Standard
50/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person reviews mention tests and study guides, but no clear exam policy is proven.
“if you do her study guides you will ace her questions on the tests”
“Just don't write a paper (they are optional) for her.”
“they put questions o nthe test that are neither in the notes or on the study guide”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Extremely nice, yet equally boring.”
“She made everything so clear.”
“Take ANY class she teaches.”
“if you do her study guides you will ace her questions on the tests”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
15
Recent reviews read by the AI
15
Lifetime ratings
78/100
Evidence confidence
Fifteen reviews across many years give consistent themes about clear slides, boredom, and helpfulness, though the data is old.
Inside 15 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
1 reported outcomes
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Incomplete 1