AI Rate Professor

English

Susan Reddington

ENGL1A · ENG1A1B · ENG1A · ENGLISH1B · ENG1B · ENG1 · ENGLISH1A · ENGA · ENGLI1A · ENG6666 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you are comfortable with , and inconsistent classroom style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay-Based GradingScattered TeachingHard GraderHelpful FeedbackToo Much Group Work
  • Grades are mostly based on essays, with little or no test pressure.
  • Students strongly disagree on and confusing class management.
  • Getting a strong grade can be easy for favored or proactive students, but and perceived bias are recurring risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A and feedback, but and perceived favoritism make the effort feel uneven.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

61/100

The course content is mostly essays with few or no tests, but the class can feel boring, scattered, and work-heavy.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person English reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Students mention showing up and listening in class, so low-value.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students are split between strong praise for her help and and unfair treatment.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Several students say she grades rough or based on personal preference, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

The class centers on multiple essays and frequent group work, with workload ranging from manageable to really heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students found her helpful and clear, but many describe scattered teaching, boredom, and poor classroom control.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Grades are mainly based on essays, with students repeatedly .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show an but scattered teaching and perceived unfairness for others.

Main concern

, and unnecessary group work.

What students said

“She never taught us and we did group work every day which was clearly only to kill class time.”
ENG1A
“ but if you submit your essays beforehand, she will tell you exactly what to change.”
ENG1B
“no tests, grade based on like 6 papers. and listen to her ramble”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly describe an essay-based course with , though one student mentions a lame in-class midterm.

No Tests ReportedNo Final ReportedEssay-Based GradeOne In-Class Midterm Mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments support an and little exam emphasis.

No Tests ReportedNo Final ReportedEssay-Based GradeOne In-Class Midterm Mentioned
“no tests, grade based on like 6 papers. ”
ENG1A
“the ”
ENG1A
“We were only graded on the .”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but if you submit your essays beforehand, she will tell you exactly what to change.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“ but very scattered.”

⚖️

38/100

“She grades based on weither or not she liked you and she didnt like me.”

📝 Assessment Style

12/100

“no tests, grade based on like 6 papers. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but very scattered.
  • Super nice and .
  • She never taught us and we did group work every day which was clearly only to kill class time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you try hard on an essay and really put the time in, then you will do well.
  • but if you submit your essays beforehand, she will tell you exactly what to change.
  • easy class i went in the last day and talked her up from a B to an A

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload & Format

  • We were only graded on the .
  • Really a lot of work.
  • too much unecessary groupwork.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across several years , and classroom style despite mixed opinions.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A8 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG11 review
ENG1A1B1 review
ENG1B1 review
Show 5 more courses
ENG66661 review
ENGA1 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLI1A1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values