AI Rate Professor

History

Carlos Mujal

HIST17A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable learning mainly from the textbook and do not depend on engaging lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAttendance OptionalTextbook DrivenPolitics HeavyBoring LecturesLight Difficulty
  • Students agree the class is not very difficult and can be passed through the textbook.
  • Lecture value is disputed, with one student enjoying the political connections and others calling lectures useless or boring.
  • , but that also reflects weak lecture necessity.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

The class sounds passable by reading the textbook and showing up for tests, but reviews do not prove an effortless A.

All grade-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students say the class is not very difficult and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

95/100

Multiple reviews clearly state attendance is not needed or not mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on whether students can tolerate textbook-heavy learning and lectures that many found boring.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews suggest passing is straightforward if students read the text and , but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

The workload appears light , and optional lecture attendance.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Lecture quality is weak overall, with repeated complaints about boring, useless, or sidetracked lectures despite one positive review.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Students mention , and a couple essays, making exams the main focus.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

optional attendance and mixed lecture quality.

Main concern

Lectures may feel boring, sidetracked, or unnecessary.

What students said

“everything you need is in the book.”
HIST17A
“Hist 17A lectures are useless.”
HIST17A
“Uninteresting and boring.”
HIST17A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard because reviews mention textbook-based tests and multiple-choice testing, with .

Textbook-Based TestsMultiple-Choice TestsCouple EssaysReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Rules

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention textbook-based tests, multiple-choice tests, and essays, but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Textbook-Based TestsMultiple-Choice TestsCouple Essays
“ text book package.”
HIST17A
“Couple essays and .”
HIST17A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ text book package. Hist 17A lectures are useless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in lectures, textbook reliance, and assessments. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Uninteresting and boring.”

📘 Textbook Dependence

68/100

“everything you need is in the book.”

🧪 Assessment Style

58/100

“Couple essays and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • He is very lively and he likes to talk about politics a lot.
  • Hist 17A lectures are useless.
  • Uninteresting and boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Attendance

  • you don't need to attend class, but I did for his lectures.
  • text book package.
  • Not very difficult class but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the but weakly supported.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST17A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values