AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Art

Anne Thiermann

ART2A · ART4 · ART5520 · ART29A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you already draw well and can handle strict critique with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear AssignmentsTough GraderCritical FeedbackStrong Formal TrainingBest For Skilled Artists
  • Students often say assignments and .
  • Grading and critique feel strict, especially for beginners.
  • A few students value the formal training and say advanced artists can learn a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears hard because students , and high expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content can build real skill, but beginners report the class is hard and poorly explained.

All evidence comes from in-person art courses, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because one student says she needed details about absences and whether they were excused.

, and online evidence is absent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many students warn against the class because and critique feels harsh, though advanced students may benefit.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students directly call her a and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not heavily documented, but and difficult studio expectations add effort.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students repeatedly describe unclear teaching, while a minority praise her formal training and skill development.

Format shift

no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and art practice rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, with and tough critique balanced by a few strong learning outcomes.

Main concern

Students may struggle with and strict criticism.

What students said

“This is not a good class for anybody who is a beginner.”
ART2A
“I have learned more from her than any other art teacher I have studied with.”
ART29A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not a good class for anybody who is a beginner.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“ .”

⚖️

25/100

“She is a and .”

📚 Learning Value

35/100

“I have learned more from her than any other art teacher I have studied with.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so wishy washy, and .
  • .
  • Excellent formal training in arts, dedicated teacher, challenges good students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a and .
  • Very critical of your work.
  • It is a good class if you already can draw pretty well.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Fit

  • If !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Seven older reviews provide enough repeated themes to be useful, but the evidence is dated and somewhat polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART43 reviews
ART2A2 reviews
ART29A1 review
ART55201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values