AI Rate Professor

Cabrillo College · Anthropology

Alan Lonnberg

CULTANTHRO · ANTRO2 · ANTRO1 · ANTHRO2 · ANTHRO1 · ANTH17 · ANTHR2 · ANTHRSECT · CULTURALANTHRO · ANTH2 · ANTHR17 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Alan Lonnberg if and want a fair class where doing the work can pay off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStorytelling LecturerPassionateEasy A PotentialInteresting MaterialSometimes Unstructured
  • Most students praise his passion, storytelling, and depth of knowledge.
  • Grades often sound very attainable if students complete the work and think critically.
  • Some students find the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Multiple students say an A is very reachable if you complete the work and use critical thinking.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is often described as interesting and easy, though some students find the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All reviews are in person, but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend him for passionate teaching, engaging stories, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students repeatedly say good grades or an A are attainable by doing the work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Several comments suggest limited assignments and manageable work, though note-taking and writing still matter.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students call him passionate, knowledgeable, and engaging, but a minority report rambling or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

, and tests, with no single method dominating completely.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing engaging stories, passion, fair expectations, and easy grades for students who do the work.

Main concern

The class can feel unstructured or lecture-heavy for .

What students said

“it's easy to get a good grade in the class.”
ANTHR2
“If you do, you're guaranteed an A.”
ANTRO2
“Hard to know what to study as .”
ANTRO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format or .

“He lectures about nothing that .”
ANTHR2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Such an interesting person full of vivid stories and experience. He has such a passion for teaching, people, and anthropology.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and open to new information.”

📈 Grade Value

84/100

“Do all your work and you are guatanteed an A.”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaches through story telling.
  • Awesome and passionate about his teaching.
  • A dynamic and enthusiastic lecturer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's easy to get a good grade in the class.
  • Do all your work and you are guatanteed an A.
  • If you do, you're guaranteed an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure

  • Hard to know what to study as .
  • He rambles on about nothing interesting.
  • The classes aren't always very linear, but you come out of them having learned a great deal of very interesting things.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are many reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and include some vague entries.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHR173 reviews
ANTHR23 reviews
ANTHRO23 reviews
ANTRO13 reviews
ANTH172 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ANTHRSECT2 reviews
CULTANTHRO2 reviews
ANTH21 review
ANTHRO11 review
ANTRO21 review
CULTURALANTHRO1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1