AI Rate Professor

Art

Angela Pearson

ART5 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless no alternative exists, because the only student voice describes a hostile and unhelpful class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDemeaning FeedbackPlays FavoritesHostile ClassroomPoor Teaching Experience
  • The only review describes a .
  • The main complaint is disrespectful treatment rather than workload or .
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one old review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The review gives no grade evidence, but the on meeting subjective expectations.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The difficulty appears to come from the professor's behavior and subjective expectations, not clearly from course content.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only reviewer strongly discourages taking the class because of disrespectful treatment.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

20/100

, but the review suggests subjective and harsh classroom judgment.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not clearly describe workload amount.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The , and awful treatment.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and unconstructive criticism.

Main concern

Students may feel demeaned and unsupported.

What students said

“Picked favorites, demeaned people's ideas with no constructiveness”
ART5

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was awful!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and classroom climate. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“demeaned people's ideas with no constructiveness”

👍 Recommendation Level

5/100

“she should be fired”

⚖️ Classroom Fairness

20/100

“Picked favorites”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • demeaned people's ideas with no constructiveness
  • treated us awfully only because she is the only one tenured to teach that class

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Picked favorites
  • was downright suspicious of students that didn't behave the way she thought we should

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one very old review, though its complaint is specific.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values