AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Carolie Coffey

SOCIOLOGY1 · GENDERROLES · SOCSECT · SOC · SOC1 · SOC6 · SOC12 · SOC5 · SOC1A · SOC2 · SOCIOLOGY · INTRO · GENDERSTUDIES · SOCOFGENDER · SOC101 · SOCIOLOGY5 · 103 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you can tolerate a rigid, confrontational classroom and learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExtremely RudeHarsh Classroom ControlOpinionated LecturesAvoid StronglyStrict Expectations
  • Most reviews describe a highly negative in-person experience with rude or disrespectful treatment.
  • Some students say the class can be easy if you read, attend, and match her expectations exactly.
  • The strongest risk is classroom climate, not workload volume.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students report easy tests and A grades, but many say grades depend on rigid expectations, exact wording, and tolerating a harsh class environment.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The subject may not always be hard, but the professor's rigid teaching style and exact-word expectations make the course feel difficult.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

, and behavior control in class.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Most students strongly warn others away because , and damaging to the class experience.

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

35/100

and easy multiple-choice tests, but many describe harsh standards and needing her exact wording.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload appears reading- and test-based with little paper writing, but the classroom rules make the effort feel heavier.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The dominant pattern is that students describe her as , and hard to learn from.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Several reviews describe grades as , and reading rather than papers.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe a strict, unpleasant class with occasional notes that grades can be manageable if students follow her exact rules.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report disrespect, rigidity, and difficulty learning from her teaching style.

What students said

“ if it sounds boring. .”
SOC1
“Her teaching method is impossible to learn from.”
SOC1
“Just do the reading and the . v. v. easy.”
SOC12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and reading-based, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Multiple-Choice TestsMidterm MentionedReading-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a midterm, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Multiple-Choice TestsMidterm MentionedReading-Based Tests
“the entire grade is ”
SOC1
“6 students failed the midterm.”
SOC1
“Just do the reading and the . v. v. easy.”
SOC12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Her teaching method is impossible to learn from.”

👍 Recommendation Level

10/100

“ .”

⚖️

35/100

“if you don't use her exact words you are wrong”

📚 Workload And Tests

55/100

“Just do the reading and the . v. v. easy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not know how to teach at all.
  • Her teaching method is impossible to learn from.
  • She states facts that are wrong and then stands behind them

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She is rude & she treats college-aged adults like secondgraders.
  • Purposely embarrasses students.
  • She does play favorites and tends to put people in a tight spot

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is nearly impossible to learn and get and A in her class
  • Just do the reading and the . v. v. easy.
  • the entire grade is

Theme 4

🚪 About Recommendation

  • save yourself and run away!!!!!!!!!
  • GET OUT NOW!
  • TAKE ANOTHER SOCIOLOGY CLASS.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

103

Lifetime ratings

83/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 in-person reviews over several years show a consistent negative pattern despite some conflicting positive comments.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 58
2 out of 522
1 out of 563

Course coverage

SOC118 reviews
SOCIOLOGY9 reviews
SOC56 reviews
SOC24 reviews
SOCSECT2 reviews
Show 11 more courses
GENDERROLES1 review
GENDERSTUDIES1 review
INTRO1 review
SOC1 review
SOC1011 review
SOC121 review
SOC1A1 review
SOC61 review
SOCIOLOGY11 review
SOCIOLOGY51 review
SOCOFGENDER1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values