AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Ken Dobberpuhl

EXTMISC · PE46 · PE8 · PEVARI · PE53 · PEEXT · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

unless you mainly want basic fitness coaching and can work around a rigid style.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWell MeaningOutdated ApproachAuthoritative StyleLow Classroom FitFitness-Focused
  • Most reviews describe him as well meaning but outdated in classroom teaching.
  • Students repeatedly say his approach centers on a narrow set of fitness philosophies.
  • One strong positive review praises him as a coach, trainer, and motivator.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

The low difficulty ratings suggest the class is not hard, but reviews do not clearly prove that earning an A is effortless.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course appears physically and intellectually light, but students criticize the narrow and outdated program focus.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students discourage taking him because they see his classroom approach as outdated and too rigid.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, so leniency cannot be proven despite low difficulty ratings.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

75/100

The course seems low in academic workload, but reviews focus more .

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students often describe him as well meaning but outdated, rigid, and weaker in the classroom than as a trainer.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe assignments, exams, or other graded assessments.

Format shift

All ; there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and outdated methods, with one strong praise for coaching.

Main concern

Students question whether his teaching approach is current and useful.

What students said

“not in the classroom”
PE8
“Ken is well meaning but just to bent on following a few programs”
PEVARI
“Ken is an awesome coach, trainer, and motivator.”
PE46

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ken is well meaning but just to bent on following a few programs that he thinks are the end all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, classroom fit, and coaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“not in the classroom”

👍 Recommendation Level

25/100

“Search out the younger teachers in PE as they outshine Ken by a long shot.”

⚖️ Course Difficulty

68/100

“Ken is a qualified teacher for senior citizens but not for a competing athlete.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hung up on a few philosophies
  • due to his authoritative demeanor, students just go along with it.
  • Ken needs to read some 21st century research articles

Theme 2

🏋️ About Fitness Coaching

  • Ken is an awesome coach, trainer, and motivator.
  • He is very knowledgable about the body and fitness.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older in-person reviews are consistent about concerns, but there is and assessment detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

EXTMISC1 review
PE461 review
PE531 review
PE81 review
PEEXT1 review
Show 1 more courses
PEVARI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values