AI Rate Professor

Digital Media Production

Alixandra Mullins

DM1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from outside resources.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedConfusing instructionUses external videosRigid lesson planPoor value
  • Students say she often did not know the material and gave incorrect information.
  • Both reviews describe the class as mostly taught through online videos and borrowed worksheets.
  • The main problem is teaching quality, not clearly documented workload or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The , and poor instruction likely makes earning an A harder than the raw difficulty rating suggests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content does not sound advanced, but unclear and incorrect teaching makes it feel harder.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly discourage the class because they saw the teaching as unqualified and poor value.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews do .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The comments do not show an overwhelming workload, but worksheets and a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students describe repeated mistakes, contradictions, weak material knowledge, and heavy reliance on outside videos.

Format shift

All and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

A final and worksheets are mentioned, but the review evidence is too limited to define the assessment mix precisely.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and focus on weak preparation, incorrect information, and reliance on videos.

Main concern

Students felt they were paying for a class that mostly used outside video materials.

What students said

“not qualified to teach the class at all.”
DM1
“Didn't know her own material, sometimes gave incorrect information.”
DM1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a final, but they do not .

Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove its format or strictness.

Final Mentioned
“In going over the it.”
DM1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'd be better off just subscribing to lynda.com then putting the money to this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and course value. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Didn't know her own material, sometimes gave incorrect information.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“You'd be better off just subscribing to lynda.com then putting the money to this class.”

📚 Course Delivery

20/100

“taught most of the class by presenting online video presentations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not qualified to teach the class at all.
  • regularly made mistakes and contradicted herself.
  • Didn't know her own material, sometimes gave incorrect information.

Theme 2

💸 About Course Value

  • taught most of the class by presenting online video presentations.
  • She taught by putting on videos from lynda.com and using worksheets from other teachers.
  • You'd be better off just subscribing to lynda.com then putting the money to this class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but both are detailed and consistent about poor teaching.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

DM12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values