AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Andrea Mollenauer

157L · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you mainly want a low-effort grade and can tolerate a frustrating teaching style.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCondescending toneUnprepared classMicromanagingLow technique depth
  • The only review reports an easy A but a weak classroom experience.
  • The main complaints are condescending communication and lack of preparation.
  • There is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The student earned an A and rated difficulty very low, but the review does not prove it is a free A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

75/100

The course appears light in difficulty, though the student wanted a higher level of technique.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

The student strongly criticizes the classroom tone, preparation, and micromanagement.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

The A grade and very low difficulty suggest forgiving grading, but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

80/100

No heavy workload is mentioned, and the difficulty rating is very low.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The review describes the professor as condescending, unprepared, and overly controlling.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

The review mentions class tasks and micromanagement but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The in-person review says the class feels easy but poorly managed and disrespectful.

Main concern

Students may feel micromanaged and talked down to.

What students said

“I feel like she is condescending.”
157L
“Doesn't seem prepared for class.”
157L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I feel like she is condescending.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Doesn't seem prepared for class.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

25/100

“Talks 2 us like we are 10th grade & not a college level course.”

📘 Course Effort

82/100

“Instead of creating task lists prefers to micromanage e1 through class time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I feel like she is condescending.
  • Doesn't seem prepared for class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • there should be a higher level of technique,
  • Instead of creating task lists prefers to micromanage e1 through class time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so confidence is limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

157L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values