AI Rate Professor

English

Denise Warkentin

ENGLISH12 · ENG12 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive on self-teaching and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderGroup projects onlineConfusing lecturesRefer to textbookHeavy papers
  • Most students rate teaching quality very low and say lectures and comments make little sense.
  • Heavy group projects, papers, and .
  • One positive outlier says rubrics, redo options, and media make it fair if you want to work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

As and Bs appear, but and and rewrites.

All evidence is from online reviews only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Lots of papers, group work, reading, and content alone.

Online-only sample; difficulty ratings swing high despite one lower report.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and not for others; online structure still requires constant work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Three of four ; only one recommends her for learners who accept hard work.

Recommendation evidence is entirely online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

; one student notes rubrics and re-dos, but .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

So , videos, and reading.

Format shift

All online comments stress high paper and group load.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Majority say she rambles, does not teach creative writing, and .

Format shift

One online outlier finds her amazing for motivated learners.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Papers, group projects, and redo-eligible assignments drive the course rather than classic exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All reviews are online eng12: , and unhelpful; one praises rich media, rubrics, and rewrites.

Main concern

, and help that only points back to the book.

What students said

“Horrible Professor. Awful, gives lots of work, videos about nothing... .”
eng12
“she makes no sense during her lectures and the assignments.”
eng12
“She will tell you to refer to the textbook and her comments/lectures make absolutely no sense.”
english12
“If you want to learn, she is amazing.”
eng12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and group work rather than proctored exams; .

Paper heavyGroup projectsRubricsRewrite options

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments emphasize papers, group projects, and rubrics; they do not clearly describe proctored exams.

So many papersGroup projectsRubric gradingRedo work
“So many papers”
eng12
“She grades with rubrics to things are fair and clear. You do have to work... She allows you to re-do work”
eng12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! She does not actually teach you anything about creative writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 online reviews, highlighting confusion, workload, and one positive outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She does not actually teach you anything about creative writing.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

22/100

“This class has group projects every part of the class even though it is online.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her comments/lectures make absolutely no sense.
  • she makes no sense during her lectures and the assignments.
  • She gives tons of infromation, class is interesting with podcasts, videos, and visuals

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She allows you to re-do work, so if you get a bad grade, that's all on you.
  • She does not grade appropriately.

Theme 3

📦 About Workload

  • gives lots of work
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four online reviews from 2023-2025; strongly negative majority with one detailed positive outlier reduces certainty.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

eng123 reviews
english121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values